LGBTQ+

473 readers

1 users here now

For anyone that is looking for all forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

Rules:

1. Be Kind
2. Don't be:
    a. Bigoted
    b. Racist
    c. Intolerant
3. Don't break any site rules or US laws

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SenatorBumCuckets

114

Republican Reportedly Called Child 'F*g' Then Sued News Outlet for Covering It (www.advocate.com)

submitted 1 year ago by FriendOfElphaba to c/lgbtq_plus

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The article points out that this republican politician and businessman, Cory Tomczyk, is suing a non-profit news site for reporting on his use of the slur towards a 13 year old boy. Although he lost his suit, he is appealing the decision. This suit has already cost the news site $150k.

How do these lawsuits not fall under SLAPP laws?

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Kftrendy 10 points 1 year ago

From the article:

In a deposition submitted by a lawyer for the news site, Tomczyk is quoted as saying, “I have a brother who is a gay guy, and I’ve certainly out of joking and out of spite called him a ‘f****t’ more than once.”

Zoom, enhance:

and out of spite

Out of spite? You've called someone a slur - the specific slur in question, in fact - out of spite, multiple times, and yet you're claiming this specific time you've been defamed? What's the defamation? Did they falsely imply that you were at a 10/10 on the homophobia scale at the meeting while in fact you were only at a 9/10 that day?

[–] ZombiFrancis 7 points 1 year ago

Because political capital protects its own.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I didn’t read the article, I don’t know where this took place, I don’t know anything about any of the people involved, but I do know this does not seem out of the ordinary at all and I am not surprised in the least.

[–] Trekman10 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe he's appealing because he can't afford to pay the fees he forced the news site to incur if he loses (I think that can sometimes be part of a decision, but maybe I'm wrong).