this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
159 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1481 readers
379 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 14 hours ago

in response to Bender pointing out that ChatGPT and its competitors simply encode relationships between words and have no concept of referent or meaning, which is a devastating critique of what the technology actually does, the absolute best response he can muster for his work is "yeah, but humans don't do anything more complicated than that". I mean, speak for yourself Sam: the rest of us have some concept of semiotics, and we can do things like identify anagrams or count the number of letters in a word, which requires a level of recursivity that's beyond what ChatGPT can muster.

Boom Shanka (emphasis added)

[–] [email protected] 35 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

'i am a stochastic parrot and so are u'

reminds me of

"In his desperation to have produced reality through computation, he denigrates actual reality by equating it to computation"

(from this review/analysis of the devs series). A pattern annoying common among the LLM AI fans.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

someone sent out the batpromptfondler signal and the mods are in shooting gallery mode

please refrain from commenting unaccordingly

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

b-but David, they’ve been so reasonable and here we are getting emotional about the fucking garbage technology they’ve come here to shove down our throats alongside a heaping serving of capitalist brainrot from the same types of self-described geniuses who gave us OKRs

[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

MRW 38 of the 39 comments have almost nothing to do with the article

load more comments
view more: next ›