this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
296 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2571 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

FBI Director Christopher Wray announced he will resign three years early, a move widely seen as bowing to political pressure from Trump.

Critics argue Wray’s resignation undermines the FBI’s independence and normalizes Trump’s governance style, allowing him to replace Wray with a loyalist who may prioritize Trump’s interests over the rule of law.

Wray’s decision avoids the potential political fallout of being fired but forfeits a chance to publicly challenge Trump’s grievances against the FBI, raising concerns about the erosion of institutional integrity.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 110 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Wray is a registered Republican that worked under Bush and was appointed by Trump. What did people think he was going to do?

His daily dose of Fox News isn’t telling him to stay.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To Wray's credit, he testified that right-wing extremists were the #1 domestic terrorist threat.

If he was a Trump yes man, they would've just had him stay in. In reality, it's probably closer to him just preserving his job prospects in the private sector and a bit of cowardice not dissimilar to Mueller and Comey.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But then he obeyed the incoming fascist in advance soooo....a wash?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

No I wouldn't say a wash, personally. If you knew you were going to be under the purview of a Trump DOJ AG and they'd make your life a living hell, sure some might be able to resist for a little but you wouldn't actually be able to do much. Trump can fire him anyway.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure this is all about his pension. If he retires now, before Trump takes office, there isn't much that can be done to take his pension away from him. If he stays on and Trump fires him for cause, he will likely get nothing for retirement.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Glad he gets some money in exchange for what will likely result in the loss of lives of many and freedom for everyone.

Good guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

James Comey would still be eligible for the Federal Employees Retirement System as a federal employee, despite being fired from his FBI director position - so Wray would be too

[–] Kecessa 52 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Leaving the place open for a Trump appointee that will stay there for 10 years

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If he was retiring in 3 years anyway, the replacement would've still been a trump appointee.

[–] Kecessa 10 points 5 days ago

If Trump makes it until then, he's clearly demented and in bad general shape.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And if you want to be that guy, Wray is technically a Trump appointee

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Why technically? Thats exactly what he is and he's been a pretty shitty too

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The institutions are collapsing faster and faster each day. This is going to be an absolute shitshow.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wish we didn't have a housing crisis in Canada or id be more open to getting Americans out of there to live somewhere safer at the moment. I'm truly scared for you guys down there and I don't know what I can do to help.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Americans know how to build, you have room.. invite them up, provide supplies, build a few new cities.

And yes, I realize it's a bit more complicated than that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's illegal to build new houses, you'd hurt the property value of existing home owners if you built more housing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

HOW DARE YOU ATTEMPT TO LOWER MY RENT!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

yes this would be nice to do, except the red tape and the backlog of housing we have.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

He's top cop, that means he's gotta be home to beat his wife in time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Top bootlicker is still a coward.