Yes, it's literally non sequitur. And a very popular propaganda move: [country A] is good because [country B] is worse. In fact, it usually is not even relatively good if there's a need for such 'argument'

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

*confused tankie noises

[–] [email protected] 136 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (30 children)

(in a similar vein)

There is a third choice, where you say both are bad (ie. anarchists and pure marxists). But most people on lemmy.ML are Marxist Leninists (ML) who simp for authotarian states that call themselves socialist, like Russia, China, and North Korea.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago

russia does not even pretend to be socialist

load more comments (29 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Stalin says to Kropotkin: "The difference between us is that you're an aristocrat while I'm from the working class."
Kropotkin answer: "True, but we also have something in common: We are both class traitors."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That was Kruschev and China's Minister of Foreign Affairs.

https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/03/weekinreview/the-world-15-years-after-zhou-s-death-his-image-is-larger-than-life.html

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Every time this gets reposted I need to point out that it is spelled: "You are not an anti-imperialist"

English is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

French:

A beautiful man:

Un <= masculin (A)

Homme <= masculin (Man)

So the adjective should be masculine, right?

But as homme 1) starts with a H and the word does not have nordic descent, it's not the masculine 'beaux' but feminine :

Un bel homme.

But not belle eh, just bel (they obviously sound exactly the same).

Because, it sounds better.

Which language was stupid now again?

It's crazy humanity can communicate at all.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago

They're just fascists.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

The tankies are out in full force in this thread.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

Man, why did I stumble on this thread after the tankies got deleted

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Simping for any government leadership is just gross. These people don’t actually care about protecting the working class; they just want power, money, and recognition. As soon as you put a human into that role, they corrupt in one way or another. It’s why I clarify that I support the struggling working class under any ruler. The fight is always about them and ensuring they have human rights and a right to self-determination.

Every person I’ve met in my lifetime that lived under communism had nothing good to say about it, and they were all working class. Some pasty white dudes in America don’t know shit about that and never will. They get into a fantasy loop because living under capitalism fucking sucks, and dreaming about something perceived as better is understandable.

I recommend people read Marx and keep trying to unite the working class. Take the good pieces and stop idolizing people. As soon as you idolize a person, you are incapable of being able to identify when they do or say something terrible.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry for your notifications OP, I went through the same thing when I posted this here.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

First it was fun watching the argument unfold. Now it's annoying lol. Thank you, kind stranger.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments