this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
193 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2003 readers
1206 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. He doesn't care about Constitutionally-protected rights
  2. He'll do this anyways, because it tees up a Supreme Court case on a fast track, or Congress just lets it happen.
  3. He wins either way
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

3b. He loves having these fights because he can say 'BUT THE IMMIGRANTS' and MAGA, because they don't actually understand anything about the American constitution or law, will back him because they'll believe it's just a bunch of liberals protecting criminal aliens.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court already ruled against birthright citizenship. The 14 Amendment overturned their decision. And Congress doesn’t have a say in the matter, because a constitutional amendment has to be approved by a supermajority of the states.

I get that people are in a bleak mood, but there are limits to what Trump and republicans can do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That's true, but I think a lot of Americans tend to think of the constitution as being more powerful than it actually is.

Just like any other set of rules, it mostly comes down to how these are interpreted. The constitution itself had no autonomy... it depends on everyone agreeing on a certain interpretation of the words as well as agreeing to enforce this interpretation.

I'm not saying that it is logical or consistent, but the wording "...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." in the 14th amendment could have some VERY warped interpretations, if you really wanted to force it...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This feels like a Federalist Society test of an attack on the Constitution. If this works, and Trump can peel away Amendments, expect chaos. The 4th and 2nd will be taken early.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm surprised that the second would be even remotely considered. If the situation in the US itself isn't enough, I have a hard time seeing that happen. But, a fascist is a fascist, and the playbook is clear enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Their people will get to keep guns, but don't think queer people or immigrants will

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just wanted to point out, all members of the military and in public office take an oath to FIRST uphold and defend the constitution of the US, and then, to follow the presidents orders. If the president\president elect is passing policies or making edicts in violation of the constitution without an amendement first being passed by congress, then every elected official, and more importantly, all military officials, have the duty, right, and obligation to stop him and his co-conspirators, both foreign and domestic...

[–] Croquette 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing is sacred for them, and their words are only used to get what they want now.

The SCOTUS is stacked in Trump's favor. He's been openly racist, mysoginist and he is a rapist, and he won the presidency.

Don't hold your breath on anything that makes sense because the next year will be everything but normal.

Conservatives will shit and clean their ass with the constitution if that mean they can hurt people they don't like

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If/when they start breaking the constitution, I'm going to make popcorn because I'm in Canada and it's about to pop off.

If there's ever a time or place to take up arms it's when the Constitution is being stomped on. If none of you stand up and take action at that point, I will be shocked, shocked I say!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I realize he's going to be president, but "Trump says" isnt news anymore. Man talks a lot of shit. I'll start to care when the "Trump does" is in the headline.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Give it about 6 weeks...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

the constitution is just a flimsy piece of paper if nobody decides to enforce it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I doubt he cares about actually ending birthright citizenship, he cares about being seen to be ending it. He's all about image, the worse the better. If the courts prevent it, or a later administration undoes his order, that's their problem, not his.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well supreme court will allow parts of it to go through. Like children of unauthorized immigrants.

But, I'm gonna be optimistic and say that I think children legal immigrants will have birthright citizenship.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

his string-pullers want this scotus to rule against the inevitable lawsuits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The Supreme Court already ruled against birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment was written to overturn their decision.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'd love to see the relevant agencies simply ignore his unlawful order. Just let him sit there and stomp around like a toddler demanding but with nobody listening rather than treat it as valid with a lawsuit response.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have waaaaay more confidence in these agencies than I do.

The reality is, with enough pressure even 'independent' heads of agencies can be replaced. Nobody wants to be in the firing line and the focus of Trump (and his followers) rage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Well I only said like to, not expect to.

I would expect someone to file a suit to block it, but just ignoring him I suspect would cause him to absolutely lose his shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And I'd like to be the King of all Londinium and wear a shiny hat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, I think the part about unauthorized immigrant will go though, but I'm gonna be optimistic and say that children of legal immigrants are gonna be fine. Fingers Crossed

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Dictators want to dictate. Fuck the rules.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So if someone expects to be put in a camp what's the best way to move thier savings?

I thought jewelery but I recall the jews had everything taken even teeth. I don't know much about American history but I know the Japanese were not treated well either during ww2. Pretty sure many lost all thier stuff.

Only thing I can't think of is bury some gold like in Russian doll.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Long term money goes offshore short term money stays liquid and if you have people you trust it with as things look to be getting worse you may decide to transfer it to them.

The main goal is to deny value without fucking yourself over. And in that vein if you have significant gold in this country get it out or if you must bury it do so without your phone or car

Now is the time to talk to a money person

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think you can assume that anything on your person will be taken. Funds and property with a clear paper trail may or may not be grabbed. There are various ways to keep money anonymously, like numbered bank accounts and cryptocurrencies, but they are not simple or without their problems.

If you have anyone you really trust, who is not likely to also end up in a camp, you might consider transferring everything to them. It would be difficult for the government to take anything that does not actually belong to you.

Ideally, I would consult with both a lawyer and a financial consultant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

buy an asset yeah Bitcoin or gold make your bet I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yes this is just noise, but if it were not, would this mean that all individuals born after adoption have to take citizenship exams and be naturalized? Even Bubba who's family has been here since the French owned Louisiana?

Or is this a "grandfather clause" kinda thing?

load more comments
view more: next ›