this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
187 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, prompting strong backlash from Republicans.

GOP lawmakers criticized the move as an abuse of power and an attempt to avoid accountability, with figures like Rep. James Comer and Sen. Chuck Grassley calling it hypocritical and corrupt.

Biden defended the pardon, citing “selective prosecution” and claiming Hunter was unfairly targeted due to their family connection.

Hunter faced convictions for federal gun and tax charges.

(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Good. Fuckem. I’d be pissed about it, too, if we had something resembling justice in this country. Let them have aneurysms.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Words have proven futile. If Dems don't play the same game Republicans play we WILL lose this democracy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago

Democracy has already been lost if every party has to play that game

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, so pardon someone besides your own son Joe. You can dress it up in flowery speech if you want but until this supposed willingness to play dirty leads to improvements in someone else's life this is just more of the same bullshit. He's not helping America with this action he's helping himself. That's not noble at all.

[–] naught 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

He already has one dead son, so I doubt he's in the mood to offer another as a sacrifice to the MAGAs

Agree that this looks and feels bad, but Hunter was overly scrutinized and punished for his crimes. He already paid his due and was the victim of a real witch hunt. If Trump was pardoning Don Jr I'd be pissed (depending on the crimes I suppose, let DonnyJ do some drugs), but that would be different because Hunter was never involved in politics, held public office or government positions, etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don't care what his reasoning is. We elected him to protect democracy from Trump and this is perhaps the most obvious example that he's always been more interested in protecting him and his friends than the rest of us. We all know what's coming in 6 weeks and look at our supposed protector's most significant action since the election, handing out a pardon to his own family just like Trump did. Thanks Joe, I'm sure we'll all sleep better over the next 4 years knowing you dealt with Hunter's problems instead of ours.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago

Hypocrites. That's all the GOP is. And their base is full of them too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I really don't think giving the head of state the power to pardon is a very good idea. I used to be totally baffled how it was a thing at all but the rationale has since been explained to me. While I sorta get it, the theoretical benefit is far outweighed by the inevitable grimy reality. Like others, probably mostly because of my own biases, I find it hard to summon a great deal of outrage about this understandable if blatantly hypocritical move after so much prior abuse of the lower had already occurred, but frankly if the option weren't even there then nobody would even need to talk about this. If the justice system of the nation is supposedly well designed and theoretically trustworthy then there isn't the need to have the ability for it to be arbitrarily overrulled in a manner that operates very much like the monarchical tyrants the United States was supposedly foundationally opposed to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Wow, they can’t even see far enough ahead to when their side is pardoning all the toadies. Shaking my head.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Na… they see exactly that. This is theatrical hand waving so they’ll be able to point to a counter example where the “Dems did the same thing!”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

just frothing up their base who itsn't informed enough to know what's really up

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I sorta dont blame them... Its not right, but I dont blame them.

Now, with return of darth cheeto and his ultra loyal crew of apointees, its now a priority to not have any active cases for the saftey of the biden family. 47 may seek vengance for any percieved offense, and the bidens going forward should not expect the DOJ to behave in the interest of justice for a few years.

The GOP can seethe and cope all they want, they laid the groundwork for this use of this sort of behaivior and uncle joe has not used it (at great expense to his sons future prospects, being national news for this long cant be healthy) up until this point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

“Republicans” “Fume”

I don’t lend any credence to headlines like this anymore. I saw way too many headlines about how “young voters hate Trump” and clearly that meant nothing when election day came so I wish these “news” organizations would shut the fuck up with this bullshit. Just because 2 people do something doesn’t make it news.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Fumes a party that endorsed a convicted felon for presidency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Fumes a party that endorsed a convicted felon for presidency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I’m not happy about it either. It’s an abuse of power, no matter whose side the guy is on. This just further degrades the office of the president into a self-serving free-for-all.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›