this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
131 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2723 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pete Hegseth says ‘classical Christian schools’ can act as boot camps to establish ‘foothold’

You know what’s not a surprise?

This.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago

The guy in line to lead the most powerful military the world has ever seen wants to start an "insurgency." I'm sorry, that's just one piece of vocabulary you're not entitled to.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago

Yes because these are totally the kind of people we want instilling "Christian ideals" in our kids.

If you can't sell your BS to an adult, or even abide by them yourselves, then stay the fuck away from my kids.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Schools in the future are gonna be forced to teach the 2020 "Stolen Election" conspiracy theory and falsely claim that the orange dickhead won the election.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the winners write the history books, whether right or wrong

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (5 children)

If winners write history, why is the lost cause of the confederacy still a thing?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

On the one hand, because liberals believe in free speech and not in the suppression of rival ideas by force. On the other hand, because Reconstruction failed.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 5 points 3 days ago

Because the confederacy wasn’t actually ever fully defeated

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Did the Confederacy actually lose, though? Or did the Union just suffer a pyrrhic victory?

Edit: Just saying, the Confederacy lost but their flag is still flown on the state flag of Mississippi, Reconstruction didn't go far enough and failed, sharecropping, Jim Crow laws, segregation, civil rights movement opposition, systemic and societal racism is still rampant and accepted (Trump), hell, the "state's rights" arguments is still one of the first reasons people give for the cause of the Civil War. Fuck, we still have legal slavery via our prison system.

So... Did the Confederacy actually lose? Cause they're ideology, beliefs, and the consequences of their hate is still rampant, and we're still dealing with their bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yes they lost the civil war. We know this because the CSA does not exist any more. I think that losing your entire country and failing to achieve any strategic objectives is a pretty good definition of "lost a war." The fact that traditions of racism still existed in the southern states during reconstruction does not mean that the CSA won. That's silly.

[–] SreudianFlip 1 points 3 days ago

Because the USA is still operating under a caste system, so in that sense they never lost.

[–] boydster 9 points 3 days ago

You mean kind of like the Hitler Youth program? Neato mosquito, totally normal...