Politics

324 readers

166 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh

pelespirit

Who Pays for Alabama’s $5 Billion ‘Zombie’ Highway Project? Not Alabama (insideclimatenews.org)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/politics

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can't read paywall someone got a better link?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

TL;DR is federal funding.

If you want more info on the project itself, it basically just says it's an economical project, not a transportation one. It won't resolve any traffic problems.

[+] [email protected] -6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What? They pop up a box asking for donations, but there's no paywall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I also got a paywall, but when I loaded the page a second time, it went away.

[+] [email protected] -8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What did this paywall say? I simply don’t believe you. Was it this message?

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

I just gave them $25, just to irritate the two of you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't memorize the message. It was a popup that asked for an email and there wasn't a way to close the popup, so I closed the article. When I loaded it again, there was a different popup that asked for donations and could be closed.

Why would I lie about this? I cannot express in words how little I care about how you spend your money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s not a paywall, but it does require you to input your email address.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I did figure that out after the whole conversation.

Having to input your email address, or just lie and click "I'm already a subscriber" which shows the article, or reload the page apparently, is not a paywall. Also, it would have been easier for these people to just do any one of those three things than to come into the comments with their mouths open, making a demanding noise like a little baby bird.

I think we should normalize showing respect to the sites that want to try to get paid for spending the money to put their good articles together, and de-normalize treating that behavior as some kind of affront against the reader and immediately start whining about it. (As if that wasn't already clear from my rude messages about it so far.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I'm with you Phil; the people that complain about paywalls are the most ill-informed people on the planet

Learn to bypass it or pay for it, or otherwise go get your news from some fucking duck-faced, turkey-toothed influencer somewhere and then you can start voting for fucking Nazis