He's old, very old
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
169 points (94.2% liked)
Asklemmy
47705 readers
546 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Tom Bombadil was basically JRR Tolkien's id. 
Yes.
I always thought tom is the embodiment of nature itself. Basically if nature was a man.
When I read about him, the first thing that came to mind is the concept of the "original man" from Manichaeism. However, the Lord of the Rings, being a trilogy that owes itself to Catholicism, would rule anything relating to Manichaeism out as a correct interpretation.
My opinion: mostly obnoxious and good he was left out of the movie.
The most boring part of the bookβ¦in my opinion.
That's not Tom. That's the forest
Yeah, thatβs fair.