this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
374 points (90.8% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

1112 readers
864 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

With local gods I think it's more like a million.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank you the local god I worship is acknowledged to be fake, but also too cool to care about not existing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Fake gods?

Impossible.

/s

BTW my country of birth decided to trade Thor, Oden and Freja against a meak jesus guy... Worst idea ever. I mean who is going to defend against the ice giants now?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The Buddha is not a god. Buddhism is nontheistic and shouldn't be included in this meme.

[–] AwesomeLowlander 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trust me, for many Buddhists in Asia he plays the same role.

Source: Grew up as one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I grew up Buddhist and I feel like people might think Buddhas are gods but they're more like role models. I hope Buddhists see that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

The picture is not of the Buddha. That’s a picture of Budai, who was a Buddhist monk and has a variety of religious traditions and worship associated with him. Fat Buddha =|= the Buddha.

Some varieties of Buddhism are nontheistic, but not all varieties. There’s the “little wheel” versus the “big wheel.” Some varieties of Buddhism have hundreds of gods.

Edit:

I do see someone that looks like “the Buddha” in the background - that is, Siddhartha Gautama.

But the idea that Buddhism is some rational atheist philosophy is very much a western gloss. Friend did a study abroad in Myanmar - the Buddha is so revered that having tattoos/casual iconography is sacrilegious and dangerous. A very popular form of Buddhism is “Pure Land” Buddhism, where the goal is to not necessarily reach nirvana, but to be good enough to get to chill in a nice place with the gods in your next life. Buddhist traditions tend to recognize their gods as trapped in samsara just as much as we are, but again, lay practice is going to treat various Buddhas as Demi-gods.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't give two shits what other people believe but they keep trying to force the rest of us to live in their lifestyles.

NOPE.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Religious belief informs ethical understanding. And ethics aren't an individual concern. They're social code of conduct.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There seems to be a large religious figure missing from this image... I wonder why that is?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

He's there, but he's invisible!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Muhammad was a prophet, not a god figure. Jesus is said to be both.

Edit: I guess, by this logic, the Buddha probably shouldn't be there maybe.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I believe in 🗿.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

This argument doesn’t really hold up to polytheistic religions, nor the problem of evil with cultures who expect gods to be evil, nor the argument of poor design to non interventionist religions.

Actually I would have a hard time formulating an argument for polytheistic not interventionist evil pantheon. Maby the canaanite’s had it right the whole time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This reminds me of Otep, "Noose and Nail"

load more comments
view more: next ›