this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
191 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2889 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 days ago

A few very vocal ~~dumbfucks~~ users of the last months need to be tagged here.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 week ago (39 children)

All the people who were screeching to abandon Harris because of Gaza seem awfully quiet now

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anticolonialist turned into a puff of smoke immediately after the election.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they were just banned. This place has become somewhat of a lib echo chamber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

It was all too predictable.

Donvict is in the pocket of the magaforbrainz that think Jews have to be in Israel to bring about the sick fantasy from their book club. Even if he doesn't actually believe in xtianity at all...

[–] xmunk 67 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Gosh but I heard that all genocide is equal and Biden is literally the devil. Do you mean that having a meaningful impact on whether Palestinians live or die was worth swallowing my pride and voting for Harris? But isn't my ideal that no Palestinian should die more important than actually saving the lives of Palestinians?

/s I absolutely can't fucking stand people who were unable to realize that less harm would, in fact, be less harmful.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You say "unable to realize", I say "intentionally pushed a false narrative to increase voter apathy".

Especially since many of them refused to engage any discussion on how much worse Trump would be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something, something Republicans are peacemakers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you can't be at war against an enemy that doesn't exist. If there are no more palestinians, you can't be at war with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Proposed Secretary of State is against Gaza cease fire.

You reap what you sow, kids!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›