this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
136 points (92.0% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2564 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rafael Grossi, head of the IAEA, called Germany's decision to fully phase out nuclear power "illogical," noting it is the only country to have done so.

Despite the completed phase-out in 2023, there is renewed debate in Germany about reviving nuclear energy due to its low greenhouse gas emissions.

Speaking at COP29, Grossi described reconsidering nuclear as a "rational" choice, especially given global interest in nuclear for emissions reduction.

Germany’s phase-out, driven by environmental concerns and past nuclear disasters, has been criticized for increasing reliance on Russian gas and missing carbon reduction opportunities.

(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Propagandist propagandizes.

More news at 11

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Because being addicted to the teat of Russian fossil fuels has worked out so well...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

According to a 2024 article in the International Journal of Sustainable Energy, Germany could have saved hundreds of billions of euros and reduced its carbon emissions by as much as 70% by embracing nuclear energy rather than rejecting it.

Good job German Greens! Well done! 👏👏👏

They are like the right wingers: ideology over facts. I bet if the conservatives win in the next election, fuck some other parts of the country but manage to introduce nuclear again, the next green government will go about undoing nuclear, regardless of its benefits.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never ever ever. Mainly because Germany is sooo bad with new tech, we don't need more juice :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We can get more bang for our buck with renewables+storage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I’m under the impression that large scale energy storage is a bit of an unsolved problem at this point, is that not the case?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, we won't. A certain dude in the government made sure to cut 99% of the funds pertaining to the study of storing energy (i.e., batteries). It is the same dude who accused the Green Party for only making ideological policies. This is the state of stupidity in this country.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›