this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
116 points (99.2% liked)

Wikipedia

1590 readers
122 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Apytele 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes once in a long while, you come across a comment that changes your worldview. This is one of those days

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just get done with an article read that was way more emotional than I needed this morning and then the top comment makes me damn near fall over laughing.

[–] Apytele 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

My question is - why is the only sane respondent listed last?

Physicist Emil Kowalski from Baden, Switzerland, proposed that terminal storage locations be constructed in such a way that future generations could reach them only with a high technical ability. The probability of an unwanted breach would then become extremely small. Kowalski expected that cultures able to perform such excavations and drilling would be able to detect radioactive material and be aware of its dangers.

Also I've been thinking about making one of these. I already made ones for me and my partner that say "goblin" and "mothman" a la

(I can't find the og Tumblr post)

In retrospect the fact that I felt like I should be drawn to banshee, harpy, selkie or succubus, but was ultimately much more drawn to goblin and cryptid was an early sign of me not really having a gender (jokes on me, now I'm an agendered succubus. Well, sort of. It turns out succubus vs incubus has more to do with bottoming / topping than it does with gender and I'm a switch so I AM a concubus, but NOT because of my gender or lack thereof).

you're welcome for the laughter

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The concept of a power bottom got stuck in my head and I drew a thing because of this comment.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why did I think that was an xkcd strip at first? 🤣

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, kinda.

[–] Apytele 6 points 2 weeks ago

same, actually!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think I may be hallucinating but I'm pretty sure this is loss

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think about these a lot. It's a cool way to frame "how do we communicate to someone who may not share any languages or even iconography with us?"

Almost alien to think about. So cool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Reminds me of the golden record

[–] ShareMySims 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong, I think these warnings are important, but the wording especially strikes me as something that would achieve the exact opposite of its intended purpose - could you imagine an archaeologist, random explorer, or even grave robber, would heed such a warning, or think "if someone wanted to hide something of great value or interest, this is exactly how they would try to keep people out"? It didn't work for the Egyptians..

[–] Object 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It reads like a riddle, especially with those repeated words. Someone's definitely going to spend some time trying to solve this. Wonder what kind of conclusion they would draw.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

"tribespeople, I have sat for quite some time by the lake of the glowing water, attempting to solve the riddle of the carvings! I have a weird tingling rash all over, but I think I have decoded it!"

[–] ShareMySims 1 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly.

I think a version of "DANGER! Nuclear waste, do not disturb!" in a couple dozen language like they have in user manuals for electronics and stuff, and maybe a selection of visual warning symbols to be safe, would work much better. That way, even if all current languages are no longer commonly known, there should be enough info to figure out at least one of them (a bit like how they did with the Rosetta stone).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago