this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

Offbeat

1283 readers
61 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/z1Rwt

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't have a squirrel because it might spread disease, but you can send your unvaccinated child to school.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Somebody else commented they euthanized peanut. Like, I'm ALL for vaccinations, but maybe take the metaphor not that far

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And he's already been euthanized. Good job protecting wildlife.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can have interesting, illegal, pets or you can publicize your life. Poor decision making on the owner's part.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Agreed. But it's also shitty to take the animal "for its safety" and then just kill it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not for it's safety, it's so it doesn't spread any diseases. It sucks, but it's not a pet and the guy who captured that poor thing is completely at fault here.

[–] atlas 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

it was an entirely indoor pet, as he had it since it was a baby. he tried releasing it, but the squirrel came back to his porch, injured, and seeking help.

in another thread someone mentioned he had it for 7 years. 7 years of being indoors, rabies was never a concern, and yet they still took him. not to mention the man runs an animal sanctuary, and is no stranger to caring for animals.

cruelty was the point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

As it always is when cops are involved.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t think he had it for seven years.

[–] atlas 3 points 2 weeks ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/animal-news/instagram-famous-squirrel-peanut-euthanized-new-york-state-rcna178473

Peanut had been living with owner Mark Longo for seven years, since Longo said he saw Peanut's mother get hit by a car in New York City.

literally took 2 minutes to find. glad you are commenting with your feelings though, very constructive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Nah. The assholes that killed it are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Welcome to government beurocracy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seems like a good use of taxpayer money.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Cops always are.

FFS, people. Take the fucking training wheels off already. Here: /s 🤦🏽‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Here you dropped this "/s"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bruh it's a squirrel in North America. Wtf they have to go and kill it. Not like like it was like the gator in the bottom of the article. It posed no more danger for rabies than any other mammal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The officers left with Peanut, who amassed hundreds of thousands of followers on Instagram, TikTok and other platforms ...

i know i'm getting old when i see things like this and my gut reaction is a conspiracy theory; in this case i think that tiktok and peanut's rising popular was the culprit since our oligarchs have banned tiktok and manufactured public consent for doing so.

and as a life long pet guardian; i feel so sorry for this guy. i hope that he can recover.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

in this case i think that tiktok and peanut's rising popular was the culprit

… yeah, that’s how wildlife officials became aware of the situation. They aren’t remotely monitoring every squirrel.

And don’t feel too bad for him, he isn’t putting the squirrel’s welfare first at all:

Longo brought Peanut home and cared for him for eight months before trying to release the squirrel into the great outdoors. “A day and a half later I found him sitting on my porch missing half of his tail with his bone sticking out,” Longo said.

A fucking bone sticking out and he didn’t even try to get the squirrel veterinary care, because it would have meant the squirrel was taken away. No vet is going to let someone without a rehabilitation license walk out with a wild animal they’re not competent to care for. And having a Really Cool Pet was just more important than, again, a BONE being exposed to the air.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Recover? I thought they euthanized him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i was referring to the person who had his pets taken away and i meant emotionally; the article states that the agency woudn't comment on whether or not the squirrel was euthanized.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Why is there a law saying you can't keep wildlife? How the fuck do you think we got dogs in the first place?! I'm domesticating a bear at home and there's nothing you can do to stop me!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If you're really keen to try this, maybe try a less destructive approach like playing Pokemon? They even evolve within your lifetime so you can enjoy the fruits of your labour!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

just keep pet fruit flies, you can even play god with their genome and witness the horrors of your creation, and that's science!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Because they don’t want people catching wildlife for pets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just get a license first and you're fine

[–] atlas 1 points 2 weeks ago

he was trying to get a licence for the squirrel as an educational pet, due to its' unique personality, and because he was so public with it.