this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
39 points (97.6% liked)

Economy

456 readers
83 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rc__buggy 27 points 3 weeks ago
[–] scottmeme 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Only correct answer, yes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

The state’s lawsuit claims that the Fish and Wildlife Service's listing requirements are "nearly impossible for the public to understand"

As in, the requirements for things to be put on the lists of endangered species? Yeah, no shit, those requirements are probably made by experts for experts. The "public" doesn't have the subject matter expertise to determine every topic, so there's a point where we have to trust these experts.

and give vague guidelines on what developers and landowners can do with their own land in the critical habitat.

I'm guessing the guidelines are pretty clear if you're not struggling to look for loopholes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know Paxton but I learned all I needed to when I saw he is suing because an animal was labeled "endangered" (and not because it should be something more like "critically emdangered")