this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
722 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Newt Gingrich blasted a Julia Roberts-led ad encouraging women to vote privately, calling it a sign of the sick values he attributes to Democrats. In a heated exchange with Sean Hannity, he accused the party of promoting dishonesty and moral decay in America, suggesting this reflects a broader erosion of societal integrity. Gingrich, who faced his own scandals, cited Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent split from the Democrats as further proof of disillusionment with what he sees as their corrupt influence.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

You can take it from Newt Gingrich, who has cheated on two dying wives, an epitome of moral compass that all americans should look towards.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

LOL, I love that these fuckers are showing their true colors.

After all the bullshit talk about "TRUE conservatism" and how donnie is not "really" Republicanism.....lol, no, donnie is the party and donnie is the party. It's all one big pile of grievance politics and about keeping special privileges for xtian white cishet right wing males.

Meanwhile, I saw Megyn Kelly on Maher and her justification for voting for donnie involves two specters, it seems - the fear of 20 million "illegals" and "what THEY are doing to the kids in the name of trans".

Seriously, WTAF. The bullshit whipped over illegals is way out of proportion and how is something like trans a concern for the PRESIDENT to handle, anyway?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

Now ya do what they tell ya
now you're under control
Now ya do what they tell ya
now you're under control

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

He's such a P.O.S.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

Too much for Newt. That is something.

[–] vaultdweller013 6 points 4 weeks ago

Can someone unload grapeshot on this old fascist or is that out of fashion?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

Shut up Newt your name sounds like the name of a villain from power puff girls.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I legit thought this guy died.

One of the other ones, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Crazy I was about to say the same thing!

Hugely influential in turning the GOP from "Side of politics we can debate and respectfully disagree with" to "Completely unhinged violent movement based on panic, hatred, and intellectual brain rot."

He's basically described like some bygone disaster and yet he's still kickin'. Holy crap.

There's a cozy spot in whatever hell right next to Kissinger for this vile beast. Another spot beside it waiting to be filled is likely labeled "Murdoch."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

So he supports Trump? Well, just wait until we deal with you, Nude.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Women having independent thoughts 🤢🤮 ^/s^

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›