So, the L.A. Times, Washington Post and New York Times are now in conservative hands. Just like the takeover of the judiciary that the Heritage Foundation coordinated. If we can ever take back our government, we need to re-institute the Fairness Doctrine, ban foreign ownership of our media and strip citizenship from this guy, Elon Musk, and any naturalized citizen that works against the best interests of America.
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
379 points (99.5% liked)
politics
19125 readers
4225 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You'd think that would be the problem, but the New York Times was run by a Jewish man during the Holocaust who buried the story to curry favor with the powers that be. He felt that at his level of capital, he'd be unlikely to suffer the way that German Jews were, even when Naziism became popular here, and therefore decided that covering up genocide was the safer bet for him politically and financially.
When it comes to this kind of shit, political affiliation is merely a symptom of the disease: being a fucking asshole. It turns out that the most important thing to the American media is money and power. Fuck the people.
Imagine a world where everyone have the class solidarity that the bourgeois have.
I know one thing: if we could coordinate ourselves even a little, I'd finally know what "billionaire" tastes like
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/30/opinion/editorials/kamala-harris-2024.html
I don't love the Times editorial/opinion boards but they're hardly the same as WaPo and the L.A. Times. They also happen to be one of the only places to get decent coverage of global conflicts, along with Bellingcat and War Nerd. They should absolutely make significant changes in their, frankly, shit tier Gaza coverage. They're also reporting on increasing attacks against the LGBTQ+ community in the Ivory Coast.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/world/africa/ivory-coast-lgbtq.html
And secret prisons in Bangladesh, where prisoners are tortured and disappeared.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/world/asia/bangladesh-disappeared.html
And (like everyone else) that Israel killed Lebanese journalists. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/world/middleeast/israel-strike-lebanon-journalists.html
They also featured firsthand accounts by doctors and a teacher of the horrors of IDF intentionally targeting children.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/10/09/opinion/gaza-doctor-interviews.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/08/opinion/gaza-teacher-students-school.html
So yes, NYT has awful coverage of Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza. Institutions are complicated and agenda-driven. They also have better coverage of conflicts in the rest of the world than most news outlets.
They also, unlike the Post and L.A. Times, actually picked a side, which is what's specifically relevant to this post.
And that's on top of Fox, CNN, Sinclair (40%? of local news), etc.
It’s not about conservative hands or foreign hands. It’s about wealthy hands. They don’t want to shoot their wealth in the foot by pissing off powerful people who could turn around and hurt their money. Burn their fucking money and distribute their goods and meat among the people to barter with in a new society built from the ashes of their goddamn empire.
I don't know what the Fairness Doctrine would do in modern times. Its legal basis was in broadcast TV and radio, not the news media in general. It never applied to newspapers or cable news, and it wouldn't apply to the Internet. I don't know why it still gets brought up except as a point of history.
New York Times are now in conservative hands
The NYT is?
Always have been.
Now... now!? They've been doing that for centuries.
And Klein, who also called Soon-Shiong a “chickens—,” stated plainly in a note explaining her resignation that “the board was not the one choosing to remain silent. He blocked our voice.”
I really want to read the planned editorial now.
Hey journalists, I've got an idea... form a new newspaper and tell your owner to go fuck themselves.
They should all start a new independent company called the Los Angeles Multiplier.
LAX for short?
No because they're on the LAM from LA Times
I think the really rich people want trump to win. Unfortunately because of that he probably will. I really hope not, but the oligarchy gets its way.
For the next two weeks, it's propaganda, as it's been for the last three decades, because they do need consent this time. But if Trump wins this one, then those in power won't need that anymore.
But even when it's propaganda, it's strange just watching the effect of rich people's influence pulling a hundred-million Americans' opinions toward Trump. It's like being able to see visible gravity, it seems so obvious when you can see it, but then you realize that those hundred-million people can't see it or even understand it as it's pulling them off the edge of a cliff.
Release it anyway. Do it in some medium other than the newspaper if you have to.
TheWrap - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for TheWrap:
Wiki: reliable - As an industry trade publication, there is consensus that TheWrap is a good source for entertainment news and media analysis. There is no consensus regarding the reliability of TheWrap's articles on other topics.
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.thewrap.com/la-times-case-against-trump-kamala-endorsement-canceled/