Politics

354 readers

305 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh

pelespirit

January 6 riot conviction of ‘Cowboys for Trump’ founder is upheld in precedent-setting case | CNN Politics (www.cnn.com)

submitted 1 month ago by pelespirit to c/politics

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on Tuesday upheld the conviction of the Cowboys for Trump founder who entered the restricted area of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, saying rioters didn’t have to know the Secret Service was protecting then-Vice President Mike Pence inside when they breached the area.

The case is among a handful that tested the foundational approach the Justice Department took to prosecute hundreds of Capitol rioters, and the decision has been long-awaited since it was argued last December by those handling cases coming through the DC federal court.

It also strengthens federal protection the Secret Service can offer, by defining more clearly the law around trespassing in areas where public officials are being protected.

“The basis of the Secret Service’s authority to prevent access to designated areas for the safety of its protectees … need not be in the mind of the trespasser,” DC Circuit Judge Nina Pillard wrote in the opinion Tuesday.

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] nkat2112 6 points 1 month ago

As always, I can count on OP, the highly esteemed @[email protected] , to give us great news!

Thank you so much for posting this.

And concerning those January 6 terrorists, I hope they get what they deserve. This is a nice ruling indeed!

[–] mindbleach 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not keen on the general idea of designating go-to-jail areas without much requirement for making people aware of that... but it's the goddamn capitol building. You followed an angry mob into the capitol building. No shit the feds have rules against that.