this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
524 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58698 readers
4600 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago

These are the small, buried reactors right? The ones that we tested on paper but haven't gotten NRC/DOE to sign off on?

I know they are MSRs but still...

[–] pandapoo 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

This is good news, relatively speaking.

SMR technology is one of the most promising pieces of technological development in the nuclear power space.

Standardized factory production and completely sealed, so refueling is only at the factory, never on-site. Their also, small, but scalable depending on the needs of each site.

I'm not sure of the design this company is using, but I'm assuming they're leveraging a fail safe reactor, as in, it requires properly running systems to generate fission, but if those systems fail, the fission process stops. There are no secondary systems that have to kick in, it's a simple as either it's running properly, or it can't run it all.

As opposed to systems like Chernobyl, or 3 Mile Island, that required separate active safety systems to guard against catastrophic failures. But if those failed, they're backups failed, etc., well, meltdown.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This makes it sounds like Google is building their own nuclear plants

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago

Emergency shutdown link hidden behind UI menu after UI menu and constantly changing locations weekly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Glad they're choosing nano-nukes and supplying their own juice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So um. What happens when the white supremacists attacking FEMA and electrical grids starts attacking these nuclear reactors?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There are already existing nuclear reactors. Why would these new ones be any different in regards to their ability to be attacked?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Privately owned, smaller, more locations, more news coverage

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

I guess I expect the national energy commission to still regulate the plant to ensure safety standards are the same between public and private.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Had me excited there for the first half, ngl...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago

Thank goodness we can now get a little nuclear waste with our cat pics.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›