this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1089 points (97.2% liked)

solarpunk memes

2729 readers
1620 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 6 days ago

Bro just ignoring all the ships we'll need to carry all that wind and sunlight

[–] [email protected] 61 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Another way to look at it: the shipping industry will take a beating while everyone transitions.

If anyone is left wondering why there's so much institutional resistance to changing our energy diet, its institutions like this that are lobbying and generating the propaganda behind it. Energy companies are just one faction.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Or they'd just ship something else? They'd lose some money and scrap a few ships, but the drop in costs would make it more economical to ship whatever else people want, like lumber and funko pops.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good lord I hate Funko Pops. Them and Minions™ are are the false idols of consumerism.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Funko Pops are just Precious Moments for millennials.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Look, let me tell you something. A Minion died for you. A Minion paid the price of sin for you and me that we deserve. Why? Because they love you. And if you think Minions are a false idol, then keep on scrolling. But if you know that a Minion died for your sins, type 'wonderful savior' and smash that upvote button

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Minions can eat my fucking ass

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Hydrogen too. There's a massive solar farm in Australia's Northern Territory entirely dedicated to green hydrogen production for export to Asia

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

the biggest resistance is coming from the owner class. the great fear is that we could enter into an age where human labor isn't needed and it becomes feasible to have a society where resources just get distributed for free because everything* is* practically free.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago (12 children)

Why don't we just have one or two very big ships, powered by nuclear reactors. Like, 40-50 kilometers long each, with hydrofoils, top speed just under mach one. Zip around and deliver everyone's shit with big deck-mounted gauss guns that fire packages right to your doorstep as the ship screams past the nearest coastline.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

I see no setting where this could go horribly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Thats exactly how I want my buttplug delivered - shot via a rail gun directly at it's destination.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Im gonna need some concept art first. for research puposes

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Currently seeking angel investors for 500m buy-in, or I'll take a 200kg of plutonium, if you've got that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What if I live in the geographic center of a continent? How do I know which coastline cannon to order from?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Depends on prevailing winds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Honestly this does sound fucking awesome. It could be sold to the ‘murica crowd.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago

Fun vaguely related fact: the 1800s are often hailed as the century of steamships, but in reality steamships had pretty short range and required frequent re-coaling in order to get anywhere and back. The coaling stations around the world were mostly stocked by sailing ships since there was no way to economically transport coal by using vessels that burned coal for their propulsion. So it's more accurate to say that the worldwide transportation revolution of the 1800s was a steam/wind power hybrid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oil is used for more than just energy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

70% of crude oil ends up gasoline and diesel.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Idk why you're being downvoted. Petrochemicals are used for a bunch of stuff, including plastics manufacturing.

We should switch to renewables as quickly and completely as we can, but it wouldn't eliminate 100% of oil use

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I argue that if oil wasn't as cheap, ecological alternatives to plastic would have a chance or would be considered at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Oil world get either very cheap or very expensive if the petrochemical fuel industry fell over

Very cheap while production was high and stockpiles full, then expensive as major producers left the industry

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I mainly agree, but it could be substituted. Various biomolecules are being investigated as a replacement substrate for established (petro)chemical processes. Part of the issue is, that you need to defunctionalise the chemicals which is the opposite of what petrochemistry currently does (which is adding functional groups as needed, not removing them).

This research, however, is stifled by the cheap Price of oil. I know an anecdote of Nivea pulling their funding into a similar project because the price ber barrel recently fell. The project was supposed to last around 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

No, they wouldn't. Capitalism is driven by supply, not demand.
If by some magic we switched to renewables over night, the owner class would open or expand another market to keep those ships moving.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

No, we would have an over capacity of shipping space, forcing the price down sharply. In the short term goods would be much cheaper to ship, reducing in a host of global economic changes- some good but alot not.

The ownership class is not physically capable of doubling our good production overnight to keep them running - long term though its quite probable. Ships will be refitted, a lot scrapped, new orders canceled- but it takes time.

And capitalism is absolutely driven by demand. Any organization that tries to tell people to buy something they aren't interested in will fail. They can alter demand, and yes they control that, but it us demand driven.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

It's both. If demand goes down, price goes down; of supply goes up price goes down.

I expect the supply of shipping is pretty stable. It takes a while for ships to be built, it takes time for them to wear out, so in this case demand would be the driver of short term change, pushing the price of shipping in those ships reduced.

I wonder what could be carried in a former coal carrier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Bill McKibben is based.

load more comments
view more: next ›