There’s plenty to be mad at him about, but I am the most angry about this blatant betrayal
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
73 points (95.1% liked)
Fairvote Canada
186 readers
28 users here now
What is This Group is About?/De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?
The unofficial Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.
Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.
Le mouvement non officiel de Lemmy visant à amener la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.
Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.
- What is First-Past-The-Post (FPP)?
- What is Proportional Representation (PR)?
- What is a Citizens’ Assembly?
- Why referendums aren't necessary
Related Communities/Communautés Associées
Resources/Ressources
Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles
- Fair Vote Canada
- Fair Voting BC
- Charter Challenge for Fair Voting
- Make Votes Equal / Make Seats Match Votes
- FairVote US
- Make Votes Matter UK
We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.
Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
I feel exactly the same. I will never forgive him for that. Doesn’t matter what his party does.
That referendum/confusing survey they did to justify their decision, manufacturing their desired outcome, was exceptionally insulting and wasteful.
I’m only grateful he and his party did this betrayal as soon as they took office vs much later. I feel like it would have hurt more if I had hoped longer than that.
Same. He should have pushed that shit thru. Without it, we're doomed.
Don't care what the issue is, Angus Reid should NEVER EVER be promoted.
He was wrong to break every promise but yes, this one in particular.
Do you feel that, like parliament, the numbers in a pie graph should always add to 100? The seat doesn't just go unfilled. Somebody has to get that last percentage.
Example: 80.4% + 10.3% + 9.3% = 100%, but all numbers round down.
I get that. My point is that if you had 100 seats to fill in parliament the hundredth seat would have to be filled by someone so it's ironic to see the opposite logic applied to a pie chart when the topic is specifically parliament related.