this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
20 points (79.4% liked)

Games

16850 readers
906 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sugar_in_your_tea 4 points 1 year ago

I absolutely love EUIV, but I wouldn't get it here. The game is so much better with DLC, but there's just so many that it doesn't make sense to jump in right now. I guess it's fine to give it a shot, but there's a subscription on Steam that gets you all DLC for a monthly cost, which is going to be a much better deal than buying them individually here.

Basically, if you like history and map painting games, EUIV has a lot to offer. I don't recommend buying DLC at this point, but I do recommend getting the DLC with the subscription.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Weird combination of games. My own feelings on Epic notwithstanding, I can highly recommend Orwell, especially for fans of Papers Please.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I crazy or is europa universalis just a worse version of crusader kings? Love crusader kings but mever tried EU because it just seems like the same game with less features?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the same engine, but the focus is different: CK is about the ruling dynasty, EU is about the country itself. Time period is also different (EU4 goes from 1444 to 1821),

A good example of that is that in EU4 your country can be the junior partner of a personal union, where it needs to fight against its rulers to get independence. You won't see anything similar in CK3, because you are the ruling dynasty.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess, idk that seems less fun to me lol. And in CK3 you can absolutely be a vassal of a larger kingdom and fight (or negotiate) for your independence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And in CK3 you can absolutely be a vassal of a larger kingdom and fight (or negotiate) for your independence.

Yes but you can't be a junior partner of a personal union, since this means that you (the dynasty) would be fighting yourself. On the other hand in EU4 this works fine since you're the ~~Senate~~ government/country/state itself, not the king or the dynasty. It was just an example on the different focus, mind you.

On EU4 being less fun than CK3: personally I like EU4 better because I care far more about groups in Modern times interacting on a global level than individuals in Mediaeval times interacting on a regional level. And EU4 always involves some sort of "if I did this in real life I'd be a monster" decision, that actually makes me understand a lot of the shit that governments do, such as culturecide or backstabbing/Realpolitik.

But there's no "right" choice, it's different strokes for different folks.