this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
251 points (94.0% liked)

Furry Technologists

1295 readers
392 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The guy who used Midjourney to create an award-winning piece of AI art demands copyright protections.

Excuse me while I go grab my popcorn.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Read headline, ok. Look for Onion source... fuck.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Ah yes, the incredibly popular pro-AI pro-copyright stance. He's going to get very far with that one.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The "artist":

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

This is like piracy, just because you claim you loose money, doesn't mean any sane being would pay you even if it was necessary, most would rather just not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

I can generate Mandelbrot pictures that no one else has ever seen. That doesn't make me an artist.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 23 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s not an artist though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Text input knuckler

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

This is actually the art bit, right? He’s doing conceptual art, like that Banksy that shredded itself upon sale.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm in the same boat. Every time someone reads one of my comments and doesn't pay me for it, that's money out of my pocket. It's a hard life being an internet commenter these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

You laugh but I seriously think people should be getting a cut if they are building a non-open LLM by commenting.

Member how people defended free price of gmail? I member.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You are now reading mine.

Is this a valid 1:1 exchange? Or are you willing to pay me extra for my response?

[–] mindbleach 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please accept this drawing of a spider: *

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

You owe them based on word count, line count, and character count.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (7 children)

First off, stop calling him an AI artist.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

The term is apparently prompt-fondler now.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Calling someone a prompt "engineer" should be punishable by law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

In general it's not used for AI artists but rather for developers doing advanced stuff with LLMs such as RAG etc...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

meanwhile startups: prompt coder/wizard!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

please call them rockstars i want to see them suffer the way real programmers did

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, he is neither is those words. I wouldn't even say the 'I' applies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

One of the reasons I like AI art is that it's pretty settled law that something produced by purely "mechanical" means can't itself have copyright, since copyright requires both originality and a human author.

It seems like a reasonably compromise, the AI was created by hoovering up the commons, so anything it creates should belong to the commons. I expect a lot of lobbying in the future to try and change it though.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And if AI work would be copyrighted by the "prompt artist" then all the artists whose work is in the training set can sue the prompter for profiting of their work without licensing fees. It would be a legal clusterfuck so it was pretty wise to side step the whole issue.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Grandwolf319 5 points 15 hours ago

Dude, you can’t end it in such a rad way and expect us to despise the prompt input guy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AI art might not be real, but Sonic giving birth to Borat is an extremely cool concept that people should be celebrated for drawing

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

[Nelson Laugh]

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

If he is considered "Artist" I am too.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh no, the consequences of your own actions! That art competition should just add a rule "only copyrightable works"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently, the competition was a year before that ruling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Famous AI 'Prompter' Says He's Losing Millions of Dollars From People Stealing His Stolen Work."

Seems like you did this to yourself, bud. You're just mad you didn't get paid enough for stealing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Famous” is accurate, but change to “Infamous” and it’s perfect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm not even sure I'd consider him a guapo, much less El Guapo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

LMAO!!!!

Next.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is he losing millions of dollars? If you're just trying to get into the art fraud money laundering scheme thing then make an NFT and find an idiot. But just the creation of a piece (be it traditional, digital, or "ai") doesn't entitle you to a payout. And if you're just complaining about the dissemination of the piece you asked someone else's computer to generate for you without a kick back link tax, well--that's not how copyright, the internet, or normal human correspondence works.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ah, good ol' music industry math. "1,000 people downloaded a picture that I created, and I wanted to charge $1,000 a piece, so I lost $1,000,000." In reality of course charging $0.02 would've stopped most sales.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm collecting all his tears to cook a big pot of pasta. Not sure how anyone would make "millions of dollars" from a single artwork anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

How much did the real artists lose out on in order to train the AI?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

lol get fucked loser. (the "artist", not OP)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Lol, lmao even

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

He is not being the neighborly neighbor Mr Rogers wanted him to be.

load more comments
view more: next ›