this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
70 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5289 readers
423 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
70
Thousands of oil rigs are nearing the end of their life—what will happen to them? (www.nationalgeographic.com)
submitted 1 month ago by RvTV95XBeo to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The "independent" corporation that owns each rig and somehow magically has no affiliation at all with the petroleum company that takes the rig's output will say "whoops, we have no money to decommission the rig and no assets to seize to pay for it, bye suckers!" and promptly go bankrupt and leave governments holding the bag.

[–] PennyRoyal 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How very dare you suggest such a thing. This kind of thinking must come from your warped mind, and very definitely not be based on the slew of mines and chemical plants left to poison the landscape, and especially not the multitude of poorly-capped methane-leaking oil wells scattered around the US by those same companies!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Alright, you got me. I admit it: Superfund sites are a hoax I invented to push my 'woke' agenda!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was gonna go with “pay a marine biologist to publish a paper saying how the rig will become a haven for wildlife playing a vital part in ecosystem “

But I like yours more

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Why not both?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fossil Fuel Barons: ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am sure it will suddenly be too expensive for them to safely decommission the platforms.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They'll probably greenwash the whole thing, saying that leaving it up is great for wildlife because it creates a habitat for birds and marine life.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 1 points 1 month ago

If corporations are people why can't we take them out to the woodshed and beat them?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Knowing humans: build additional ones, but also keep these ones working past their eol date, after all, the short-term financial side effects of destroying all the things are negligible, and the profits huuuge.