this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
421 points (96.1% liked)

World News

32075 readers
950 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United Nations General Assembly voted 124-14 on Wednesday to strip Israel of the right to self-defense in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

The test of the resolution was based on the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion in July that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory was illegal.

The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

Among the 43 countries that abstained were Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Some 12 of the 27 European Union countries abstained, including Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Sweden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

They never had that right to begin with. A foreign military force has no right to self defense from the occupied people.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 hours ago

It's not self defense when they're the ones attacking.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is this just symbolic? Does it levy any penalties for not complying?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 hours ago

The resolution has declaratory power only but provides international backing to those countries that want to take additional steps against Israel.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Ashamed that my country abstained here

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And nobody will obey that decision.

ICJ has made some rulings about Artsakh too. Should have been not so hard to sanction the beheading savages out of occupying a small country and expelling its residents. By the way, in the UN charter a "country" does not only refer to UN members, that distinction is intentionally made clear in a few places.

UN is less useful than Holy Roman Empire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

It’s not a decision to obey. It’s just a boring skit they put on once in a while. I feel like the kids’ Model UN has more actual impact on society than the UN and its toothless performative bullshit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Weird that the comments and the top level post are calling out the countries which abstained but apperently no one cares about the 'against' votes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

I think it may be due to the "against" votes coming from the obvious places (Israel, USA) and a bunch of tiny places most people couldn't point in a map.

The "curious" ones for me are Panama and Argentina. Curious as in I wonder what their statements to vote against would be

[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (15 children)

We need to expel Israel from the UN. These religious fanatics have no place in the civilized world.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Removing a country from the UN for doing horrible things would defeat the UN's entire purpose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

IDK, FRY was de facto kicked out of the UN in 1992.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

Part of any international sanctions is to leave something for the perpetrator to lose.

Otherwise, they can do literally everything without any further consequences whatsoever - it won't get worse for them.

Also, as rightfully mentioned, part of UN's goal is restoring peace between nations, which is harder to do when they are not members. That's the problem with Palestine, and it will get worse if Israel leaves too.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The headline is genocide apologia and should be banned.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The entire article is utter apologetic trash, doing its absolute best to show how unpopular this decision is (despite being hugely popular) and focusing on "Hamas terrorism concerns" without any consideration at all given to Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Why list a select 15 abstainers in the summary rather than the 14 voting against? Besides the obvious ones (Israel, US, Czechia), there's Hungary, Argentina, Paraguay, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Palau, Nauru, Malawi, Tuvalu, Tonga and Micronesia.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Why do all the Polynesian countries support Israel so strongly?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The COFA states are very strongly aligned with the US and pretty much always vote with them. I don't know much about, say, Tonga, but I'm guessing it's a way of signaling cooperation to the US as well.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago

Cheap votes to buy or bully. Simply too poor to afford a conscience.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago

They nearly always follow USA in voting, so Israel gets supported indirectly.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It is possible none of us will live to see Czechia vote against the interest of Israel as all parties support it and there is pretty much no organized pro-Palestine movement. Israel says we're their top partners in the eastern hemisphere, which means a lot because most countries are in the eastern hemisphere, including itself. At least, aid toward them is not nearly as popular among politicians and citizens as for Ukraine (we have a sizable, well-behaved Ukrainian minority already and took the most refugees per capita at the height of the crisis).

As for why pretty much every politician is either oblivious or bootlicking Israel: see my comment under a post about the shredder escapade 4 months ago

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for the explanation! Such a shame that anti-Zionism is so often conflated with antisemitism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

What's funny is that lots of people outside Prague are racist and most of them make no effort to hide it. Our nation very much prides itself in dark humor and very few topics are taboo, we even have racial and Auschwitz jokes. However, most people are oblivious to what's happening in the area so even if you made a really good point for Palestine and composed it into a joke, it's not going to resonate with any audience. Maybe university students (though a great deal of them are pro-Israel so you might get cringey faces and boos).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Rights" can only be taken away by force, if there is no method to ensure compliance, this is yet another meaningless resolution.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The UN is a diplomatic organization. It is a forum to discuss things and literally has no actual means to enforce anything. Its goal is not enforcement, it's to discuss.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago

And prevent such global wars like WWII. Funnily enough, the state of Israel was funded exactly by an UN resolution, and now Israel is trying to discredit the same institution that's responsible for the existence of their state.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Exactly. Every time the UN does something, people say "they can't enforce it".

Well, that's the whole point of the UN. To resolve things without using force.

It's a good design, designed by people who learned from the horrors of WW2.

It's sad to see how many people nowadays forget those lessons and are itching for global war.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You got it ass-backwards. The point of the UN as opposed to LoN was that it can enforce shit. And do that very heavily. The only problem was that the chosen group of wise and powerful to decide this now includes Russia as the heir of the USSR (why the hell) and China (which is not the China that got the place initially) and UK (which is collecting cannibals to suck off all over the globe) and USA (which just arbitrarily invaded Iraq and didn't even apologize) and France (seems kinda normal, but CFA etc were not nice) and the situation really sucks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Russia and the US are involved because the other half of the UNs purpose is to keep them both from nuking shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

I, personally, am itching for progress. In my lifetime. What history has proven is that progress is never achieved without bloodshed.

Though there is one very easy step the US at least can take that isn't bloodshed: STOP SELLING WEAPONS TO ISRAEL.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›