this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
382 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., repeatedly suggested a leading Arab American activist is a Hamas supporter when she testified Tuesday at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on hate crimes, and he told her she should hide her "head in a bag."

The activist, Maya Berry, said repeatedly that she did not support Hamas and was "disappointed" by the minuteslong exchange toward the end of a hearing called "A Threat to Justice Everywhere: Stemming the Tide of Hate Crimes in America."

"You are the executive director of the Arab American Institute, are you not?" Kennedy said at the beginning of the exchange. She said she was and agreed with Kennedy that she is a Democratic activist.

"You support Hamas, do you not?" Kennedy asked, referring to the militant group behind the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks on Israel. The question prompted gasps and surprised laughs from the audience.

"Senator, oddly enough, I'm going to say thank you for that question, because it demonstrates the purpose of our hearing today in a very effective way," Berry responded. Kennedy then cut her off and insisted he needed a yes-or-no answer.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 118 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Grandpa Munster keeps getting worse.

Fun fact… he’s one of the first Republicunt traitors who traveled to Moscow on the 4th of July to kiss Putin’s ring.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No i think it was to let Putin violate his ring

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Tsar’s favorite tar star 🍩

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, this guy sounds like a real asshole

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's also a fake accent. He absolutely did not talk like that earlier in his career.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He was also allegedly a lawyer at some point, but I find that difficult to believe.

It's like something happens to a boomer's brain when they hit 40 that just drains any intelligence or empathy the person might have once had, and it's replaced with selfishness and cruelty.

Lead really did a number on this country.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Crazy that this is the same generation that grew up protesting the Vietnam War

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you see they were in danger from the Vietnam draft, doesn't take empathy to act in self interest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Well, he is a member of the GOP, I expect nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

This is one of the dumbest motherfuckers that I have ever had the displeasure of hearing speak. Every single time I've seen this moron speak, I've walked away stupider.

It is absolutely shocking to me that this man graduated high school, let alone college or fucking law school.

Mind boggling.

Just seeing his photograph in the thumbnail, I can hear his stupid fucking voice...

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Turns out law school isn't that hard, it's just really, really annoying and expensive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a dear friend of mine likes to say "Someone had to graduate at the bottom of the class."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

He probably graduated law school over 50 years ago. Any knowledge he learned from the 70s/80s is irrelevant

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can be intelligent AND evil. You are forgetting they just ignore the evil part cause it supports their motives

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well... Yeah.

But this man is not intelligent. I assure you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I heard he was a democrat in the past and looked up some of his ads/debates during the 2004 election. He criticized tax breaks for the rich and advocated for affordable education and equal opportunity for minorities. Jesus it's like he got replaced by a lizard person.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?183616-1/louisiana-senate-campaign-ads

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (3 children)

"Is it true, Senator Kennedy, that you are in fact an idiot? A moron? A rube? A stooge?"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

A fascist? Anti-American? A prude? A hypocrite? A degenerate molester? A fan of Hot 100 music?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"you're a nut! You're crazy in the coconut!" "What does that mean? That boy needs therapy!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It's true, this man has no penis.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

Gotta love how he completely ignores her answers and asks follow up questions that imply she said the opposite of what she actually said. And how he repeatedly criticizes her for unequivocally stating her position in complete sentences instead of just saying yes or no, which would be less clear and easier to take out of context.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

Headline: Old White Man blames racism on non-White People for existing.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Foghorn Leghorn sure loves to get attention by acting like an ass.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Looking at his Wikipedia page, it looks like at one time this guy wasn't a complete asshat like he is today.

Age gets us all, but I hope I don't become an asshole before I kick off.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

People are just letting the evil out now instead of hiding it like before.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Reminder that it's not just the presidency that needs an upper age limit.

[–] zarkanian 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We don't need an upper age limit. We need term limits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Personally, money first. Term limits are fine, but not the biggest problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

"You know what's disappointing to me? You can't bring yourself to say don't support UNWRA, you don't support Hamas, you don't support Hezbollah and you don't support Iran. You should hide your head in a bag," he concluded, to gasps and yells from the audience.

What an asshole.

Asked by Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin, D-Ill., whether she had anything she wanted to say after the Kennedy exchange, Berry said, "It's regrettable that I, as I sit here, have experienced the very issue that we're attempting to deal with today.

You go, lady. You're a badass.

load more comments
view more: next ›