this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
251 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There are 75 election certifiers loyal to trump in swing states, 22 of which have previously changes related to the previous fake electors scheme.

He's hoping they'll case enough doubt on the election that it will invalidate it or provide an excuse for further actions.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yep, Trump's got several paths to stealing a dictatorship:

  1. States refuse to certify, leading to lawsuits and eventually the subverted SCOTUS handing Trump their EC votes regardless of what the actual popular vote counts were. (Bush v. Gore 2.0)
  2. The traitorous Trump certifiers sow enough doubt that violence breaks out. (Jan 6 2.0)
  3. States refuse to certify, leading to results being thrown out entirely, neither candidate getting to 270 EC votes, and the election being decided by a "one state, one vote" poll in the House (which Trump would be sure to win because of all the low-population red states).
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The traitorous Trump certifiers sow enough doubt that violence breaks out and Vance refuses to certify. (Jan 6 2.0)

Kamala Harris will still be VP when the votes are counted this January 6. Yes, she will be certifying her own election, win or lose. It's a quirk that happens when a sitting VP runs for President. Ask Al Gore about it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

At least you are still smarter than JD Vance

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

This is when we get the revolution on, right? RIGHT?!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

By chance, is it ‘wear eyeliner’?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Well? It’s not “shared his couch”, though I don’t know trump swings that way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] zaph 23 points 1 month ago

No shit, Huff. You think maybe that's why he was picked? Nah, gotta be because of how well liked he is.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Pence wanted to be VP for personal gain, putting up with Weird 34 in the hopes that Pence himself would be Prez someday. Pence probably thought Sleepy DonOLD might choke on a hamburder, get removed from office by the Senate after an impeachment or two, or at the very least grit his teeth and hope for his own shot after Dementia Dork went into the sunset. Pence just wanted to be POTUS, not start an autocracy.

Just Don't Vance, on the other hand, is on a whole other level of weird submissiveness to Putin's Puppet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let Trump select the donuts?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Donuts? Nah he's on that Mickey D's diet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Even if they do win in Nov, the Prez is still term limited and can't run again. So Vance will never be in the same position as Pence. I suspect this is just empty posturing to play to a certain crowd, knowing that he (Vance) would never get called on it...

Edit: Though he might do it for, say, his own Presidential run in 2028. But that's not quite the same thing - Pence wasn't being asked to make himself President four years ago.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree but what the heck is your username and instance domain dawg? Out here lookin' like a generated 25 character password lol

P.S. to the mods I ain't tryna be mean or troll or anything, just pointing out that the username and instance domain looks pretty weird.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No worries. I host my own instance basically for free, and - the funky (but free) instance name is the price I have to pay for that. I figured that my username should probably match as well, so...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It kinda reads like MLK you serve us, I like it lol

Not in the racist way! Like he worked on our behalf to help us lol

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Haha I gotchu. What service do you use? I didn't know there was a free instance hosting service.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Well, I self-host (using a laptop at home). But srv.us provides me the required DNS/domain name for free - it's similar to ngrok if you are familiar with that.

That said, it's possible to get an instance hosted completely for free on the cloud - Oracle Cloud specifically. See https://gopinath.org/2022-11-11-hosting-ktistec-on-oracle-cloud

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

"Fuck that couch, Mike..."

[Years later]

"Okay JD... You know why you're here. There's a couch here, so you just do... Whatever makes sense."