this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
33 points (90.2% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

57 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

• Politics

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
33
Why does climate change seem to have so little political presence as an issue right now? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

...seems like a big issue

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In addition to the usual corruption, it’s also worth noting that while there is broad support for climate action, voters typically don’t place this issue very highly among their list of concerns. So, people support action if you ask them but it isn’t top of mind and doesn’t seem to be a deciding factor in how people vote.

The political system isn’t completely corrupt. Our leaders are ultimately accountable to voters, but only if we wield our power intentionally and in large numbers. Right now, that’s not happening on this topic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Our leaders are ultimately accountable to voters

Not so much at all really

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's moving up the ranking in places. In the recent UK general election it was ranked 5th. Above usually big issues like housing, defence, tax, education and crime.

Considering the top two are really massive problems for the UK at the moment (cost of living like most places with the post pandemic inflation and health care has seen a decade and a half of systematic underfunding) I think that's pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Self-reported rankings are always unreliable. Revealed preferences of voters demonstrate that climate isn’t a salient issue.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In the US at least, both major parties are funded by companies that are profiting from destroying the planet. The politicians don't want to ~~anger their masters~~ drive away their donors, but they also don't want to drive away voters, so they take a wishy-washy "stance" and avoid the subject.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Biden Administration: Drafts, fights for, passes and signs the largest investment in climate change policy in the history of the planet.

You: bOtH sIdEs ArE tHe SaMe!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Profit. And the people who are profiting reckon they'll be dead before it becomes a Mad Max shitshow. 'Murica. Rational Self Interest. Which means "Fuck you, got mine. I have a bunker in New Zealand. Do you even stock, bro?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago
  1. It gets treated as a "we'll work on it when we're not busy with wars, inflation, etc etc etc" issue. It's important, just never the top of the list.

(It's gonna fuck us blue but humans are bad at dealing with tomorrow's problems before tomorrow)

  1. In the US election now, if you lean D, you care. If you lean R you don't. The assumption is that Harris would address it and Trump won't, so your vote for/against climate action is implied.

That said, the amazing growth of solar may yet save us from ourselves, if we're very lucky.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

kinda a big issue... I guess it's hard for people to really relate to the effects of climate change on a day to day basis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People care but there is really nothing we can do outside of trying to vote for someone who will do anything. The problem is the majority of the people voted in are being paid off and they will never do anything to disrupt the cash flow they receive from fossil fuel companies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

fortunately demographics will eventually shift policy on the issue, but hopefully sooner rather than later. Although the progress in renewables currently I think exceeds what anyone thought was possible 20 years ago... solar is actually the most economical power now, so that'll at least curtail a never ending emissions future, which is what it use to look like.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You know, it used to be called global warming, but they shifted the term to climate change to make it sound less threatning.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

No, they changed it because it's a more appropriate term for the phenomenon. While global average temperatures are rising, the net effect of having more energy in the system is change (broadly speaking for the negative).

Using 'global warming' as a term gives misinformation spreaders an easy tool to undermine the concept on a cold year/winter. 'Climate change' cannot be undermined in the same way, because anyone can plainly see that the climate ain't exactly what it used to be.