this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
100 points (98.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7108 readers
318 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The city decided against pursuing legal action against the Sanders and Trump campaigns due to the potential costs, which might have outweighed any potential financial recovery and placed the burden for legal fees on taxpayers, Squire said.

Pathetic. Straight up admitting the city will only go after working class people while leaving rich people off the hook for $80k bills. Pursue legal action and have Trump pay the legal fees of both parties when he loses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're not wrong, but this is a broken failure of our legal system at work that rewards the wealthy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

This is why ACAB doesn't go far enough. Prosecutors and judges are just as guilty if not more.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why does anyone allow him to have a post-paid account. It needs to be retainer order

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Grifters gonna grift.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Because the GOP's packed with a bunch of simps who genuinely think Trump loves them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I had family that used to live in Sierra Vista. That's some deep Trump country that wouldn't mind taking a loss to have him visit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Bernie too? Wtf? Is this more common than I thought?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you implying that Trump doesn't pay his bills? The audacity! Harold, being me my pearls at once that I might clutch them!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Better bring the vapors too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting. This kind of bill is for costs incurred as a result of the rally rather than for directly using the facilities, e.g. paying for an increased police presence to control protestors. Seems like candidates are not really obligated to pay for this.