this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
302 points (99.7% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4714 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People rarely take $100s, who is going to break a $331,000 bill?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Sigh. Have my upvote

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ask a hot dog vendor

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you think he’s going to have on his OnlyFans account?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

One Rudy, One Cup.

[–] Kellamity 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I read in the paper today that a bankruptcy court is going to take 40% of Katie Price's OnlyFans income

When i saw this headline my brain skipped to Rudy Giuliani's OnlyFans income

Has Rudy Giuliani considered OnlyFans?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He's on cameo, as John Oliver did show Maybe if you make a nice offer you can get a Rudi Nudiani?

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 23 points 3 weeks ago

Oh shit…guys what if Trump doesn’t cover the cost of Rudy’s loyalty? Damn, that would suck. I’m sure no one that that was even a remote possibility, right? Oh well. Anyway…

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sigh… Can we please get better copy editing? Answer, unlikely.

The film, Global Data Risk, was hired to check

Anyway, on to the good stuff.

Oh no, Rutabaga! This is such terrible news! How will you survive your horrific debts with your stupid podcast now? I'm so sad for you, Rutabaga. You're so targeted by wicked Leftists and it's all so unfair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's Newsweek. Half their columns are entire AI generated, and that's only because the other half are written by a collection of nepo-babies who got jobs as favors to other people in the industry.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hope for him that he has to live paycheck to paycheck for the rest of his life and has never enough to spare to put to the side.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope he makes too little to afford healthcare but too much to qualify for Medicaid

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He's 80 years old. Although that means we'll be rid of him relatively soon, it unfortunately also means that he's eligible for Medicare.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

The hair dye must be pouring down his face

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

"The truth will come out! You'll see!"

That time was BEFORE you went bankrupt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I was happier when he got disbarred in New York, but I'll take this too!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

The bankruptcy case got thrown out but after getting handed the bill he'll be bankrupt