this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
320 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4589 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
320
Little-Known Project 2025 Policy Would Tax Benefits for More Than 15 Million Workers (www.commondreams.org)
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Project 2025, the right-wing policy blueprint spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and co-authored by more than 100 former Trump administration staffers, has been denounced for several of its tax proposals, including slashing the corporate tax rate and the capital gains tax to benefit wealthy Americans—but a research group on Wednesday warned that one economic policy that hasn't gotten much attention could "greatly increase" financial hardships for millions of working families.

EPI Action, a nonpartisan research and advocacy organization affiliated with the Economic Policy Institute, published an analysis of a proposal that appears on page 7 of Project 2025's section on the Treasury Department—whose authors include at least two people who served on Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's campaign and transition team for his term in office.

The proposal calls to tax employers on workplace benefits that exceed $12,000 per worker annually—which would undoubtedly "lead to employers cutting back on these benefits," wrote Josh Bivens, chief economist for EPI Action.

Based on health insurance benefits that are provided to more than 150 million Americans through their employers, Bivens found, more than 15 million workers would see their benefits taxed under the Project 2025 plan.

Those workers would collectively pay over $12 billion more in taxes if their employers shifted away from providing benefits as a cost-cutting measure.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

The proposal calls to tax employers on workplace benefits that exceed $12,000 per worker annually—which would undoubtedly "lead to employers cutting back on these benefits," wrote Josh Bivens, chief economist for EPI Action.

Funny how even the Heritage Foundation would advocate for a tax increase (on their corporate masters, even!), as long as the end result is screwing over the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I can feel it trickling down and it's unpleasantly warm

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

It finally happened!!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago

They probably just want companies to reduce benefits to avoid paying the tax.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago

Do you know that Trump spent many hours in front of the mirror, working on his “Clint Eastwood” face? Y’know the sort of squinty, vaguely threatening one he does a lot as a gun-toting rebel authority?

That’s not conjecture, it’s been reported by people in his orbit in the 90s. Yeah he uses it like on his mug shot - that’s him doing it extra hard cause he’s so tough or whatever.

Anyway, the picture in this article is not that face. This is his “punchable” face. He just has it. Didn’t need to practice it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The party for the wealthy. After all, all Americans are just sheep to be shorn by the elites.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's even more malicious than that.

As is so often said around here, "the cruelty is the point." Fleecing the working and middle class is definitely a huge goal, probably the main goal. But they want to do it in a way that demoralizes the average American. The backers of Project 2025 want to break the spirit of the majority of Americans so we are more subservient, to both their continued fleecing and to their oppressive authority. And the best way to do that is to install division and self-hatred, and take away our voice.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's time to take away their voice

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe their entire heads.... politically.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

These people are so fucking stupid and greedy. They are so busy chasing ways to steal more money that they haven't even thought out all the possible outcomes of their actions. They want to gut employee sponsored healthcare by removing tax benefits that companies enjoy by providing healthcare all while taxing the average person for paying for healthcare. But unless they can do away with ACA people will just start moving to public options. I mean why stick with the shitty plan your company provides if you're just going to get taxed on it all anyways. So the working people get screwed and companies will lose the largest bit of leverage they have over employees. Sounds like a winning plan to me! (/s)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you get stuck with a public option, but are over the income threshold, you will be much more reliant on being employed.

They are devastatingly expensive. The plan I'm on is more than all my other bills combined including my mortgage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I believe it. I looked into it this past year because the company I currently work for has mediocre health insurance. I honestly don't know how anyone can afford any of the current public options. In theory these options should be better but in practice they're just as rigged as everything else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly, it's a blemish on Obama's legacy. It's not sustainable. We need Universal Healthcare or Single Payer.

The ACA is just dragging out the vampism of big health.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Anyone aware of this Curtis Yarvin guy?

My friend sent me a link but I haven't spent the time yet to verify. Apparently Japanese journalists covered the story?

For those familiar with Star Citizen lore, he wants to turn the US into the Stanton system...

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1es0gsl/if_you_havent_heard_of_it_look_up_the_vanceyarvin/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Or in the parlance of people behind such devious plots: this would tax the "takers".

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 weeks ago

Common Dreams - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Common Dreams:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.commondreams.org/news/project-2025-tax-plan
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support