this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
614 points (98.3% liked)

Political Weirdos

756 readers
167 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 3 months ago

what a weird person to so proudly display their idiocy

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago

@[email protected], please do not abuse the report system. Reports are for rule violations. If you don’t like the community or its content, please find or create another instance or community. Lemmy is an open platform.

Reporter: @[email protected] Reason: Conundrum indeed since this is reddit 2.0

[–] Assman 45 points 3 months ago

Tread on me harder daddy

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“He’s OUR criminal, so it’s ok!”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

So you did Nazi it coming

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

They back a felon and the most prevalent gang in the US. Seems logically consistent to me.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

They probably support the murderers in uniform the hardest.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There is no conundrum here. When you're rich and white, the term felon has no meaning.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Nah not rich and white. I've seen poor and white, poor and black, rich and black all back him no matter what idiocy the orange man shows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Well, it's clearly a vowelous error because he though I/O, instead of U.

[–] freeman 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump's crimes were all breaches of regulations. Not real crimes like existing on the wrong side of the color chart.

But more seriously isn't the police itself known for using their "discretion" unevenly?

It doesn't seem that much of a contradiction to me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

That is 100% what these Blueliners mean. "Allow the boots to tread on all the people beneath me."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I don't imagine they see a contradiction - it's "back the badge" not "back the unbiased rule of law"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's even more amusing when you consider how the Trump administration kept trying (and failing) to slash law enforcement budgets.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

nice try, but you can't make me support Trump

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What if he passed universal healthcare, established world peace, and walked on water?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

At that point I wouldn't be voting for Trump but the person he's trapped in a body swap scenario with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

There is nothing he could do to convince me he would do any of those things since he didn't do them when he was president. Same with his promise to leave NATO.

But if he did become president and did all those things, we'd have no further use for him in power, so why would we support him after that?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Hens for Fox '24

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Conservatism should be a disqualifier for positions of authority.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Looks like they're perfectly well aligned. The difference is that cops can commit felonies and not get a guilty charge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

This is only a contradiction if you don't understand that the "thin blue line" slogan was never about supporting the police upholding the letter of the law, or even the spirit of it. It was about supporting racist cops who disproportionately target minorities and are quick to use lethal force against them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

If Trump’s felony convictions had happened before the election they’d have carried a little more weight.