About time.
I thought the hesitance was ridiculous from the moment the war began, and I'm not a warmonger or anything.
edit: Heck, if they had a referrendum in the US for it, I'd vote to send F-22s.
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
149 points (98.1% liked)
Ukraine
8497 readers
549 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³π₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
π³βοΈβοΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
πͺ π«‘ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
F-22A + F15E + F16C could make a pretty deadly combo.
You got the F-22 for air superiority, and air cover. Or use its stealth to strike russian fighters and bombers that are in russia.
The F-15E can be used for ground attack, or even close air support. It could also be used as backup for the F-16's if they get overwhelmed.
The F16C being a multi role fighter could do a lot of these things, not as well as their dedicated platforms but still preform well. Not to forget the F16 is superior in SEAD.
It's a fantasy for sure, as I can't imagine what kind of training/infrastructure the F-22 needs, even if the US gets over its fear one one being shot down and salvaged.
But yeah, gettin air superiority and making use of it would be incredible.
Isnβt there fewer than 200 F-22s in existence?
Yeah, and mind as well put them some to use before they're obsolete, doing exactly what they were built to do: defend NATO airspace.
Same here, its horrfiying the LACK of support.
YES