this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5158 readers
388 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
44
Wildfires Are Getting Weirder. Case in Point: Firenados. Global warming is increasing their intensity. We need to get more creative to fight them. (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Jeeze even wildfires are leaning republican?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let's get creative by addressing the root cause instead of the symptoms ey bloomberg? It in the title yo. Instead of "getting creative" by reacting to every new unlivable reaction the planet has to our attacks how bout "getting creative" by trying the shit we know will work?

I'd love to break down this stupid authors bullshit line by ridiculous line, but bloomberg hides its yeah behind a wall so ill just guess that this tool is moving blithely to the propaganda stage wherein: global warming is real and also inevitable so we need to deal with that instead of ever cutting emissions.

Am i close, bloomberg author? Ya hackoff?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The article is posted with a gift link, so you should be able to read it instead of guessing.

This particular writer has a history of both calling for a fossil fuels phae-out and dealing with the adverse consequences we've already created

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thanks, missed that. Ill try again op

The best thing we can do is limit future global heating by curbing greenhouse-gas emissions.

he did it! He said the thing! Ah, i feel a tiny bit better.

For that reason, developers need to stop building in the wildlife-urban interface where these blazes turn deadly and costly. And public officials need to stop subsidizing further disasters by offering relief funds to rebuild in fire zones and artificially suppressing insurance rates, thus preventing the market from pricing people into safer areas.

Hmm, this is his opinion? This is creativity? I don't feel good anymore.

Yeah, I'm right back to "useful idiot" at best (author, not op). There's no creativity here, and nothing for poor people, (most of us) at all. Then again, it's a bloomberg opinion so that's expected.

Thanks op for the link and the post

[–] Reverendender 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well, if we can nuke hurricanes, then I see no reason on why we shouldn’t be able to nuke the Firenadoes.