Not going to celebrate full employment until hiring practices see some noticeable regulation.
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
234 points (91.2% liked)
politics
19156 readers
2550 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Like non compete clauses being banned? Passed by the FTC apparently down party lines. So, vote for Dems.
That's a start
Yeahhh. Not to mention that these numbers are inflated by part-time employment and "gig" jobs being at an ATH, while full-time hirings are down
Unemployment numbers are bullshit because it specifically drops any that haven't found work in months.
And then to rub it in, even if you're unemployed, your benefits are garbage, and not need-based.
You're talking about the U6 numbers. Those are tracked as well
It's almost as if half of these comments are economically illiterate.
Its irritating to see twitter-level bullshit starting to creep in here
It's irritating to see condescension and people being needlessly smug too.
It's not bullshit. Why would you count stay at home parents who are not looking for a job because they have no interest in them? Why would you count people going to school with the plan of helping themselves out in the future?
It's not perfect because, as you point out, some people get discouraged and drop out. But considering there is a labor shortage right now, this argument doesn't make much sense as these people should be rejoining the work force.
Wait there was full employment? That wasn’t my experience over the 10 months I was unemployed. It wasn’t my experience watching the mass layoffs in my field.
I feel like I have been gaslit by the news saying the economy is up and unemployment is down and all I can see around me is the contrary. The past year was infuriating
That is shitty, and it probably won't make you feel better, but there were people doing very well during the depression as well. The average is just that, average. Individuals experience wildly different realities.
Well, you are absolutely right that it doesn’t make it better lol. It’s like that “Well, it could be worse” thing people say. The people doing very well during the depression were doing so at the expense of everyone else. I wouldn’t say it’s a good thing for a parasite to be engorged on its host.
I just hate how the media acts like everything is peachy and good as I see another mass layoff knowing my contract won’t be renewed. While I get that this is not at all representative, I did see a big industry fire so many people after record profits.
Where I live, I’ve been seeing a lot of people struggling to get groceries and shit while the market boomed, as supermarkets made record profits. I applied to many hundreds of jobs during a hiring shortage, and I have a few friends who applied to more.
I get these metrics aren’t supposed to represent me, but they do not represent the world around me either. If not that, then who is it supposed to represent?
And to be told that “Bidenomics is good for the economy” might be factual based on these metrics, but to see all those good lines go up and bad lines go down and see everyone around me struggle is super fucking dissonant, and to get that level of gaslighting is a bit insulting.
The economy is complete bullshit and isn’t a metric of the average either.
The time during Bidens presidency has been fantastic for me and my family. Both my wife and I got huge pay raises, she then switched jobs for a much better hours and still making bank. We've been saving a lot of money and our investments have skyrocketed. Things are clearly more expensive, but I haven't had to worry about it too much. Also because I live in a fairly well off area, it appears everyone else is doing very well.
Because my personal situation has been so good, should I assume that this is true for everyone in our country? Or should I be smart and recognize that my personal experience is anecdotal and not representative of the whole economy? Should I blame the media too for reporting what's actually happening?
I’m glad things are going well for you, and I don’t mean this in any sarcastic way or anything.
Because my personal situation has been so good, should I assume that this is true for everyone in our country? Or should I be smart and recognize my personal experience is anecdotal and not representative of the whole economy? Should I blame the media too for reporting what’s actually happening?
I get my personal experience isn’t the average. I also get that, while a better representation, knowing the experiences that my friends and family are having isn’t the average.
My problem isn’t my experiences not matching the average. My issue is the metrics used by media are not a representation of average, and the pain of seeing these metrics show things are supposedly getting better where so many things around me are getting worse, at times in order to improve the metrics used by the media.
My issues are twofold:
I don’t think the metrics used by the media, ie the stock market, are wholly representative of whether or not things are going good for the average American. When things plummet, sure, I’d agree that’s a good metric, since companies will panic and then people will get screwed. But I don’t think markets doing well means things are doing well for the average American.
Sure, the line might be going up, that’s good for some people, but there are many reasons why that could be happening that have no impact, or even a negative impact on the average person. For example, a new technology could have been discovered that lets workers do double the work. A company that fires half their staff will now be making more profit, since they are paying less in wages, and therefore their stock values will rise. Half of their employees were sacrificed on the altar of the stock market for those gains. To use a more recent and frequent example of something that fucked me over: tech layoffs. Tech companies will often purge a lot of employees when doing things like preparing for an acquisition, or immediately following one. Sometimes, they will just thin out their staff following a completed project, or something similar. This often has a positive impact on stocks, but a dire impact on workers.
I also have an issue with the partisanship of the media and how the economy is presented to us differently based on who is in power and the bias of those, but that’s a whole new can of worms.
things are supposedly getting better where so many things around me are getting worse,
But things are getting better. This isn't to say we don't have a lot of catching up to do, because of the damage that inflation has done, but the overwhelming amount of the numbers make it pretty clear that we are going in the right direction.
I don’t think the metrics used by the media, ie the stock market
This is not at all the metric we are using. You are specifically complaining about unemployment rate. Which is what this post is about. It's funny to bitch about the media being misleading, while complaining about the market not representing the average joe...when the number being discussed in the article is not the market and does represent something good for the average joe.
I worked at Lowes as a department supervisor because that's the best job I could find despite having an IT degree. It eventually got to the point where management was forcing unrealistic expectations on us then regularly threatening to fire us for not meeting said unrealistic expectations. They eventually made us take over an entire other department's responsibilities so that department could do nothing but sit around at their desks all day. We already were barely keeping up and now suddenly our workload more than doubled. One day I got called into the office and they demanded a plan for how I can improve my performance or I would be fired "for real this time". I then turned in my 2 weeks notice. By the time my last day came around, my entire department had already quit.
Fuck corporations. They are destroying America. They have destroyed the job market. We're all going to be living in mud huts eventually.
There are tons of bad jobs available but no good jobs. In the government's eyes these things are equivalent and that is the problem.
Yeah, I know. Unemployment is a fucked metric, especially if you have the misfortune to have student loans, a shit job, and live in an expensive area, you’re quite simply fucked.
Fuck the premise of "full employment." As if having an income that supports you is some binary fact of job or no job. What about shitty job with an exploitative organization the federal government has permitted to become an oligopoly?
At my job unless you have 100% availability with 0 restrictions you cannot acquire more than 20 hours at minimum wage plus change. Not a surviving wage.
It’s insane to me that employment isn’t given any nuance.
Because in the past 'a job' was enough. It's not anymore but the boomers and Gen X don't understand that.
Don’t lump X with the boomers. We have had vastly different experiences.
Yet y'all are pulling similar shit these days...
Stow that shit. They’re not the same and you know it. XYZ solidarity matters.
Then why are they punching down.
They aren’t. Pick your fights after November.
Congratulations! You are employed, even if you are only working half the normal hours to get a luxurious starvation wage!
I hope you are proud to be a golden star on this country’s incredible employment statistics! Uncle Sam loves ya for it!
Aaaaand on that note, I think it’s time I play Outer Worlds again.
I just got laid off so my tractor factory could send my job to Mexico
Don't be scared to name and shame. Unless there's legal reasons why you can't.
I'm not scared, it's Deere. Deere spent an ass load of money on stock buybacks and sent our jobs to Mexico so they could make line go up and enrich themselves at the cost of their workforce and product quality. Now instead of paying me $40/hr they can give a Mexican $5 (which I understand isn't even that good in Mexico) and John May can afford caviar and luxury furs for his horses.
Still making record profits though, praise be to Line, the only thing that matters.
You'll find that one of your voting options promotes this far more often than the other. If this is your single-issue vote, you'll be happy to know that you may debatably have been in good hands, but you were in the best hands.
I'm sorry the umbrella of unionization didn't extend far enough to protect you this time, but I hope it will have by next time; and I hope you have a good job quickly.
Trump will 100% send the rest of our jobs to Mexico just like did with Carrier. I really hope Future President Harris doesn't.
view more: next ›