this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
175 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Saving you a click: The problem is they are rabidly, provably anti-labor.

Disclaimer: I have not clicked on the article.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Problem is proof involves facts and reason. The majority voting R are doing so on vibes, so if they feel like the GOP is the working man's party (and they'll let Fox News tell them it is), then that's how they'll vote. They don't care that they hurt themselves in the process, as long as there's still someone else they can feel is beneath them. Who they will also somehow be convinced is the root of their problems rather than the policies they've voted for, allowing them to play the victim card and continue feeling justified in voting against their own interests to keep others down with them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

What are you going to believe, literally all of the evidence or what I tell you is true?

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It worked for Reagan. All they did was wave a flag in slow motion on the TV box and hey presto - blue collar Republicans, voting against their own interests for 40 years straight, no sign of stopping.

Of course it’ll work now.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wish the public wasn’t so stupid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

You think it's stupid but the trickling will start any day now, any day!!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

And that's why the GOP wants to diminish education.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

Horseshit. There’s absolutely nothing pro-union or pro-labor about the GOP. They only care about handouts to their wealthy masters.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never forget that the official Nazi party name was "National-Socialist German Labourer's Party." Fascism has been trying to get the workers on its side since the 1930's (unsure if Mussolini did it too in the 20's)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

“Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Can anyone point to the last piece of major legislation that the Republicans passed that has improved the life of the working class?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

It wasn't major, but the Toupee's administration did get rid of the tax penalty for people who couldn't afford insurance under the ACA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Leopard says it is pro face

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

A pro-workers votes party.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hmmm, wonder if they're aiming to be a National Worker's party. There's no easy they'd incorporate the word Socialist into their name, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They don't particularly like socialism (unless it's for big business and billionaires), so we'll need to come up with a shorter, snappier name to hide that part. I just do not see that happening though...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some Nazis who are averse to the word “socialist” have been replacing it with “traditionalist” (because, you know, that’s based, with tradwives and white-picket-fenced churches and all that). So, National Traditionalist American Workers’ Party could work

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If you rearrange it to National American Workers' Traditionalist Party you can give it the acronym NAWT. Prononced as in "this party will definitely help American workers. NAWT!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Hmm... NATional... SocIalism... NATSI!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I know couple other regimes that brand as a pro-labor party.....