Saved you a click, they all like the movie Breakfast at Tiffany's. That's the one thing they got.
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
30 points (77.8% liked)
politics
19240 readers
2173 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
For those late millennials and zoomers not in the know..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSgJ5On8Zso
This was the only song we listened to in 1995.
Someone had to add context to a pop culture joke I made I'm fking spiraling yo put me out to pasture with Biden and Trump
That's how I feel when I "fifty watts per channel, babycakes".
Had to look that one up, but it seems it was for a regional store and I'm outside the region. I guess it didn't have the cultural impact of Deep Blue Something, a band of which everyone can certainly name three songs.
This was the only song we listened to in 1995.
Truth.
Hey, hey, hey...
If I recall correctly, I think we both kinda liked it...
I think I remember that film, but I'm pretty sure it's actually just a basic grasp on reality.
please stop being interesting times
This seems like a pretty obvious hierarchy of needs situation. Swingier reps are worried about losing their job entirely, while safer reps are worried about their status and influence in the caucus if they rebel.
Also, I've seen it at least hypothesized that there's a lot of calculus going on with whether a public statement would actually influence Biden in their preferred direction. If the Squad came out en masse to advocate for Biden stepping down would that make him more or less likely to do so? Seems like it would have at best limited impact and very well could backfire.
looking at how the article presents its story makes me skeptical because the numbers from the article's sources say that biden only has 33% support in the senate and 36% in the house, but the article presents it in a way that makes it sound more like 50/50.
if you analyze the sources along with the article you'll read that, democrats are split into roughly equal number of 3 camps in the senate and a little bit more lopsided in the house in favor of biden; they are 1) concerned about biden or biden should step down 2) neutral and 3) biden should keep going.
the more liberal democrats; according to DW-NOMINATE; remain with biden while the more conservative democrats have either called for his resignation, have doubts, or are staying neutral with more of the conservative democrat's positions being vulnerable to replacement by republicans than the liberal democrats positions in this election cycle.
and black voters are once again his biggest base of support, as they were in the 2020 election despite trump's gains with that block since then.
Biden doubters also hail disproportionately from swing states or districts. Thirteen out of 37 represent places that Biden lost in 2020 or won by fewer than 10 percentage points. This makes sense when you think about it: The reelection of representatives like Rep. Susan Wild could hinge on how well the Democratic presidential nominee does in their districts, and they may fear that Biden will drag them down with him if he loses big.
... yes, that's kind of why we're worried.
To be sure, it would be a political crisis for Biden to have even one elected Democrat saying he should drop out, let alone 10.
So this is, like, 20x crisis?
In tight districts even Biden winning a state could be a loss for the rep. Democrats could lose a +2 seat in a +5 state if the election ends up at 51/49.
Lol. That first line was crazy.
The first line always hit the hardest.