this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
156 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Now that it involves they're kids, it's an issue

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's always the way. Every single time. I'm beginning to think con voters have some mental deficiency where they literally can't imagine things outside their immediate perception.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

“Empathy is for suckers and communists“ <- the conservative ethos in a nutshell.

[–] Zipitydew 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait so republicans fail the Voight-Kampff test?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Stupid upside down turtle

[–] Zipitydew 0 points 1 month ago

lol wouldn't surprise me. Their NPC talk probably is projection like usual.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Think of how stupid the average conservative is then remember that half of them are stupider than that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Lack of empathy :/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's a mixture of that and some kind of sadism. They love to protect power and inflict pain.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Not to be pedantic, but since you're emphasising it: their (they're = they are)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the correction

Edit - I only dislike pedantry when it's repeatedly thrown in my face by the ex (/s), you weren't being pedantic IMO

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The 'edit' button is right there, my dude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

When I edit something, I make it separate from the main entry. Not sure when I picked that habit up, but there you go. Does the entry say "edited" on it, or does it look like a normal message? It shows as "edited" on my side.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, it doesn't show "edited" on our end. From what I can tell, the only way for other users to see the edit is to type out the edit and explanation as you did in your previous comment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Edits are indicated by a pencil icon (or asterisk plus a parentheses with the edit timestamp if you're using old.lemmy) next to the username. The pencil icon timestamp only shows the edited timestamp unless you mouseover it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm on Connect on mobile and the pencil icon or asterisk/timestamp don't show. It's cool that they do on desktop, though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Ah interesting. Various marks for edits show up in most clients I've tried (sync, jerboa, thunder)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hey! Thanks for the answer sister, I no further need to bother

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I thought it was being used sarcastically.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I never thought it would be MY kids traumatised in a mass shooting in school." - Conservatives.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So true. How fuckin brain dead do you have to be to actually have this take in life? I can't even grasp it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

The bit that gets me is that these new found campaigners for (weak-ass) gun control honestly thought they were going to get something from the Republican legislators they spoke to. Which part of not caring until it was your own kids made you think other Republicans were going to give a shit?