this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
20 points (71.7% liked)

Games

16234 readers
1350 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conciselyverbose 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rubin continued: “The engine is really great but it does require a lot of work and with that work comes a lot of bugs that other engines have already worked out.

“We’re not a shooter that’s been out for 20 years. If you like what we are trying to do stick around and you’ll see things improve and new features get added. But if the game isn’t for you that’s ok you can move on.”

The quote is a lot less aggressive sounding than the headline.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, the article is just 70% quoting the guy's tweet, it's barely an article.

[–] conciselyverbose 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True, but people remember the headlines, so I wanted to make the actual quote slightly more visible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Oh no, you're correct there, it's just sort of a shame that they took an otherwise pretty level tweet and then made the headline sound like he was being dismissive

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I don't understand his point. He's saying the engine was not built for shooters, but wasn't the engine first used in The Division? I would describe that as a shooter.