38
Disgusting. Just another example of conservative scum passing off authoritarianism as "looking out for the children"
Obviously pedos are bad. But this is just a stepping stone to normalizing cruel and unusual punishments.
It's a two-step process:
- Misuse the word "groomer" until it means "anyone that isn't strictly heterosexual" (while also taking away useful vocabulary to describe a real abuse tactic).
- Make cruel and unusual punishment legal for "groomers".
Make no mistake: they want you dead. It's that simple.
The face eating leopard's mouth is watering.
I for one am for it but I bet they don't castrate priests or public figures because "they're not the problem", it's those "other" sexual predators (democrats). Because they don't realize that it's largely a conservative problem, I'm not saying there aren't liberal sexual predators (there's tons) but the numbers lean heavily one way.
The aspects to this issue are... Interesting. On one hand sex offenders are considered the lowest the low so who cares how they're treated on the other hand it's cruel and unusual on every level.
Then, if they do consent to the surgery the state and tax payers don't have to pay to imprison one of these sex offenders but so many human and civil rights, regardless of the crimes committed are being violated and what's worse the supreme Court of this country is downright unless some you can't count on them striking down this down right abysmal in Draconian law.
Although Hammurabi would be proud.
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
38 points (95.2% liked)
politics
18138 readers
3703 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS