351
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

Bruce is a billionaire. He's on their side.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

And remember, there's no ethical billionaires, no matter how much philanthropy they do. Their billions are out there exploiting people.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Philanthropy is just the wealthy justifying their tax avoidance by wanking publically about how giving they are. If they were genuine about their concerns for giving back, they would pay their fucking taxes and at a higher rate. Tax avoidance and financial shit fuckery like corporate bailouts, share buy backs and COVID payments accelerate wealth acruell and drive up inflation and wage stagnation. Fuck. Them. All.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

You're thinking of Poison Ivy.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Superman was already going after CEOs when Batman was first created. Batman was always a hero for the right wing.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Is this a ThinBlueLine x Punisher crossover episode?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

Pretty sure theres a lot of batman media that confirms that people hate him because he basically just protects the rich. They even call him a billionaire playboy.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

I once read that Superman was a humble man who faces big exploitative businessmen, while Batman is a big exploitative businessman who stands up to homeless people. The implications of Batman being more popular than Superman today and what this says about our society is enough for a complete essay.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

Or Batman's more popular because he's a more interesting character. Superman can only experience kryptonite so many times before you start to suspect he never actually left the planet Krypton.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Maybe, or maybe they have bad writers because they are not able to imagine credible stories in which Superman's strength is useless in the face of the corruption of the system and the businessmen who abuse their power, no one would believe stories like that, you need to add kryptonite to make it realistic

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

useless in the face of the corruption of the system and the businessmen who abuse their power

You could put any superhero in that situation and have a story. But if it's just a white-collar crime setting, would Supe then be any different from any other Tom Dick or Harry? Is it even a superhero comic at that point? It would be interesting to some, but I can see why the writers wouldn't want to take that risk.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Well, I'm not a big comic reader but that's what the story with Lex Luthor is about, right? how all of Superman's immense power is useless against the intelligence of a rich and evil man. I think that is the most famous antagonist and that has transcended the comics the most for a reason. Maybe for fans it's doomsday or zod, but for casual readers and the general public it is lex and it is for good reason.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

what the story with Lex Luthor is about

I dunno, seems to end with a big fight and / or kryptonite almost as often anyway. Then again, doesn't that kinda undermine your original point?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Then again, doesn’t that kinda undermine your original point?

I don't understand why that should be done, the character stops being popular, so good writers stop having interest in working on it, they try to revitalize it with different stories, etc. whether the loss of popularity precedes the bad stories or not is not something that I am in a position to determine. In any case it wasn't my point, I'm not a big fan of comics, I read it there and in movies/television, which if I continue a little more, it makes some sense

[-] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

And politicians. Clearly corrupt republican politicians who are trying to destroy democracy for some reason.

[-] Gullible 193 points 1 week ago

No. Unequivocally no. This might make sense on its face but it misunderstands Batman at a fundamental level- Batman is a hero who cannot make sense. He is severely mentally ill and craves change physically and instantly wrought by his own two hands.

If a CEO were doing something outlandishly and visibly evil then they might find themselves on Batman’s radar, but exacerbating wealth inequality is just not something Batman usually cares about. Would it make sense for Batman to do something about it? Yes. Absolutely. Would the crazy 100 kg gymnast dressed like a giant bat, who has made a nightly ritual of shattering the spines of impoverished criminal dockworkers do that? No.

Now daredevil, daredevil might find himself beating the ass off a shady Manhattan CEO. But daredevil is sane, reasonable, and goal oriented and Batman is just not.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 129 points 1 week ago

My brother in Christ, Batman is a billionaire CEO.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
351 points (79.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

28365 readers
649 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS