this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
1289 points (96.2% liked)

The memes of the climate

1543 readers
1 users here now

The climate of the memes of the climate!

Planet is on fire!

mod notice: do not hesitate to report abusive comments, I am not always here.

rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 140 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They say that like it's a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

What kills me is that this is a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts. The longer they fight against change, the more people they will convince that capitalism itself is the problem.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Exactly. End both of them

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe capitalism needs to suck it up and pull itself up by its bootstraps instead of needing subsidized fossil fuels. /s

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

↑ This, but without the /s.

In particular, we need to protect the free market by creating a carbon tax to compensate for fossil fuels' negative externalities and level the playing field for "greener" competitors.

Not taxing carbon is anti-capitalist protectionism.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That or have the state stop giving money to corpos that definitely don't need it, or by breaking up monopolies just so fair competition can be a thing.

Seriously, thinking that America's system is capitalist is just as stupid as thinking it's the land of the free

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (9 children)

You don't need to end capitalism to help the climate.

Just properly regulate it. It's a tool just like every other economic system, and shouldn't be hoisted to a higher pedestal. Every system that fails fails because regulation falls off the wayside and leads into corruption. Capitalism's only strength is it took longer to get there because all the power was spread out for awhile.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's a pretty shallow take on historic economics.

Capitalism had a role to serve as the transition out of feudal economics.

Now it's time to do better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Better as in what though?

We've used every economic system by itself, and the only really successful version is a combination of them with proper regulation. What else do you do?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Well there was a guy with a funny beard who wrote about what happens when capitalism produces more goods and services than could ever be reasonably consumed by the populace of the world. He wrote about how there were basically 2 coutcomes. Either the the rising supply just keeps pushing prices down until the only issue comes down to a logistics and distribution problem and money functionally becomes pointless and state power doesnt have any heirarchy to enforce. Or the people with money and power enforce artificial scarcity, through tactics like letting crops die in the fields, or only release so many diamonds into the market and promiting it as a good thing, to protect their wealth and power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That seems more like a jab at capitalism than anything I said in that previous question.

Better as in what? What else hasn't been tried?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consider this: modern capitalism was pretty much inconceivable to people living in the feudal era. In the same way, it is possible that the system we need is inconceivable to us at the moment. Critiquing capitalism and advocating for a move away from it is still useful.

There are plenty of things that haven't been tried aside from small-scale examples:

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Okay, fair enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

regulation falls off the wayside and leads into corruption

And vice versa! Corruption leads to lack of regulation. It's a shit circular dance that I feel like we're doomed to repeat regardless of the economic system we pick.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Corruption nearly always leads to more regulation but targeted against competitors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's pretty clear we aren't necessarily talking only about the quantity of bills passed, but also the quality

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Capitalism is a horrible master but a good slave. Just like we regulated the other forces of nature (like fire) to harness them in our favour, so should we harness market forces to work for us.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Capitalism works well when there is plenty of potential for growth, but when there are non-monetary reasons (such as the literal end of ecosystems favorable to human life) that require adjustments or even degrowth, it quickly devolves into feudalism - and the problem is that we do not have the means to quickly stop CO2 emissions without tightening our belts in energy consumption, which in turn requires some degree of degrowth.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a lemmy equivalent to /r/SelfAwareWolves? Because this fits.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

selfawarewolves material

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. It's just that capital would grow slower. You can have a green capitalism. It just that no one invested in that

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is externalities. Companies have to be held responsible for their damage.

If governments held companies liable for the full cost of fixing their damage to humanity and earth I honestly don't know how many would be left.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but you missed the memo that polluting is free

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kellamity 4 points 1 year ago

"Green capitalism" only exists if green energy is more profitable than climate-harming alternatives

Given the multiple decades of oil and gas infrastructure, that's not realistic.

In theory, consumer demand for green energy could make this a reality, but it would have to be a massive swing. And in practice, most consumers will go for the cheapest option - in many cases, given their resources, they have to.

The other way that green energy could become more profitable is through heavy government regulation. So... yeah you could have a green 'capitalism' if the State manages the market, and withstands the corporate pressure to withdraw. But that has literally happened nowhere

I suppose hypothetically you could argue that IF a company invested heavily in green technology and IF that investment resulted in a cheaper form of energy, AND that technology also applied to the supply chain, then we could have green capitalism. But i mean that's highly speculative and it also would be entirely a coincidence

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

"Think tank" as in circlejerk.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I miss r/PragerUrine. Par for the course for a right wing cesspool

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a c/toiletpaperusa?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

hey friend I'm new to lemmy. is c/ the new r/ ? like is it denoting the subreddit name? sublemmy?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think it's been the shorthand that people use because it's so similar to reddit and it's easy to understand.

They're called communities and I don't actually know how to link to a community using the Lemmy format.

I think it's [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think it stands for community. To visit c/[email protected] for example, you can go to lemmy.world/c/[email protected]. Although I'm not sure writing c/ links to the community in comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I've only recently come across PragerU on Youtube, and ever since I have only been rolling my eyes at what they say.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They're yet another cancer on society...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Honest question, what economic or political system exists out there that would be better for climate change?

Or is the assumption that system doesn’t exist yet?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Any system that has some growth built into it will eventually cause problems, it's just that some of them, like capitalism, are very efficient at getting us to these points faster. The best system for the climate was discarded long ago, as we moved out of the hunter-gather phase and discovered techniques in maximizing our energy into other things besides just surviving. Agriculture and all that it allowed were the first steps into taxing the earth's balance.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Best comedy website ever

load more comments
view more: next ›