this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
119 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

34546 readers
95 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 87 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I loathe the wording that's been normalised around tracking. The options for the upcoming dialog are "Allow" or "Ask app not to track".

Why the fuck do I need to ask, as if the app is free to deny my humble request not to be spied upon? The whole tracking industry is awash with weasel words and vagueness in an effort to have us make ill-informed decisions.

Fucking parasites.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let's not forget. Yes or not till I accidentally click the wrong button

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Or even worse, you'll hit yes, because hitting reject is not an option for whatever fucking reason

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I think it is this way because Apple thought it would be misleading if the option was “deny tracking”, because there isn’t a specific technical mechanism to ensure that. It’s unfortunate but I’d rather it was honest than lied.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I hate how no ads is not an option. It's either abusive ads, or personalized abusive ads. And of course, your data is up for grabs

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Your data isn't yours to keep. It's already gone, for sale to the highest bidder for pennies, several times a day.

But it IS yours to spoil. Become unhinged.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Homepage of which looks like ad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Been running AdGuard for years once mobile DNS profiles became available. Hardly see any ads, and (on the rare occasion) when I do, they’re jarring and out of place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

You're not wrong. Opened it in a mobile browser and it looks messy - but it is a solid product.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I pay for premium. I think it’s fairly priced because I get music too. $14/mo.

[–] thetreesaysbark 6 points 3 months ago

It's annoyingly fairly priced. I'm fairly sure they're doing this at a loss to put competitors in the music streaming services out of business so they can hack up the price.

Standard Google/TV streaming service practice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Lower the cost to ten usd and ditch Youtube music, that would be ok for me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I wish there was an option without YT Music. I already use Spotify and don't plan on changing that, so the Music part of my YTP subscription is an unused redundancy, which is really unfortunate.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

I hate how YouTube seems to intentionally show salacious ads if you opt out of ad personalization. I get a ton of Temu spam despite not purchasing anything from that app or even having it on my phone, and the ads themselves usually feature scantily-clad women that takes up 70% of the screen. I've made a habit of just opening up the comments section and keeping them open the entire duration of the video. It really feels like YouTube/Google/Alphabet is saying "oh, you don't want people around you to think you're a perv? Let us collect more data about you so you can save face in public when you use our app at the gym or at work."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Apple - protects users from increased tracking, makes companies ask

Users - consent to increased tracking

Apple -

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Apple "tracker protection" is a lie. The capability to track users is embedded in the source code of the proprietary software, the only thing ATP does is not share your advertising ID with other beyond Apple. Advertising ID which shouldn't even exist in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It also allows apple to block app updates which ignore the users choice

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

shorter headline: youtube enabling standard ios feature.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

"... unless it makes you rich"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

My wishes and dreams finally coming true.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's no reason to even use the YouTube app. One of the first things I uninstall on Android.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok, how is Android relevant when the article only talks about the iOS app?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

To point out that: even on the operating system/platform where the YouTube app comes from, it is pointless. Works fine in a browser.