this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
149 points (99.3% liked)

30 Rock

441 readers
116 users here now

A community for the fans and critics of the show 30 Rock.

Discussion of the show, pictures from the show and anything else 30 Rock related.

Rules:

  1. All DubVee instance rules apply. See the sidebar at https://dubvee.org. Those are pretty comprehensive, so we don't really need to add much to those.
  2. No politics outside of what's referenced on the show. Let's leave that drama elsewhere since there's plenty of it.
  3. All posts must be 30 Rock related or adjacent. You dummies are awesome, so I don't think I've ever had to mod any posts for this, but codifying it for good measure.
  4. Don't make fun of people for misusing dated cultural references. Are we all cowabunga on this?
  5. No talking about Krang. It would be a waste of time to talk about Krang on ~~television~~ the internet.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

30 Rock S3E8 (2009)

Bonus: A similar joke from the Office (US) S1E2 (2005)

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

SKINNY ARM HAVERS!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not to try too hard to explain the joke but I think the core concept being highlighted here is one of a perceived discrepancy between "diversity inclusive descriptors" and terms that imply "otherness." For example, a white person might feel uncomfortable using the term "black" but would be comfortable with terms like "person of color" and "African-American." Linguistically, this might be because "person of color" implies that the individual is first and foremost a person and that their color, in an ethnic sense, is an additive quality to their "personness." I'm a person. You're a person. We're all...persons. That sort of thing. Similarly, a person who is African-American is, much like the (I'm going to assume American) white speaker, also American. It's the idea of an immediately identifiable, if unspoken, shared quality.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I interpreted it more as (like the title implies) Jack's inherent racism. Due to the type of company he usually surrounds himself with, the only time he ever hears the term "Puerto Rican" is in a negative context, in which someone is using the term as a way to insult someone or complain or something. Jack does not have a diverse enough friend circle to actually have ever heard someone use the term "Puerto Rican" to refer to someone's ethnicity without making some sort of judgement on the person.

[–] ShareMySims 5 points 4 months ago

This happens with the word "disabled" too, so much so that there was a whole #SayTheWord thing about trying to educate people a couple of years back about it not being a negative word or a pejorative, just a factual one, and why euphemisms ("special", "differently abled", "handicapped", "handicapable", and so on and so forth) are infantilising, othering, and otherwise harmful to the community, but it went about as well as you'd expect...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Isn't that just racism? I thought internalized racism when minorities unconsciously assimilate to the racism they are subjected to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I think we can all agree Liz (and Jack) are pretty racist.

[–] QuantumSparkles 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There’s a similar bit from Schitt’s Creek I really like about the word “Jewish”. I’d post it here but I can’t find a good quality version

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This definitely doesn't do well at capturing how flustered he was in the scene, but here you go.

Schitt's Creek S2E5 (2016)

[–] Ashyr 4 points 4 months ago

That’s a great scene. I need to finish watching that show.