this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
388 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3574 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Love that he’s still hitting the pavement. Bernie is one of the real ones.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why can't there be more politicians like him?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago

Good stuff Bernie, wish you'd been our president

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wish he had been president back in 2016. Things would have been so much better.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Imagine how much differently the pandemic would have played out with Bernie at the helm. He wouldn't have thrown away the existing pandemic response plan that the Obama administration had left behind. He wouldn't have delayed the response to the emerging pandemic because it was primarily hitting areas governed by a different political party. He wouldn't have had the federal government seizing PPE equipment from states and businesses in order to redistribute it where it would do him the most good politically.

Millions of people would be alive today if Trump hadn't been in charge when the pandemic hit.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

I'm not from the US but I greatly admire Bernie Sanders. Few US politicians seem to care about working class Americans as much as he does.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Any drug made with even a penny of taxpayer money (grants, funding, etc.) should be priced to taxpayer-affordability levels, with any corporation making it beholden to production SLA’s that severely ding them (far more than they could ever make off of the drug) if they cannot meet 100% of market demand.

Plus, set up a government company whose sole purpose is to serve the public by producing drugs at cost for anything that isn’t meeting market demand. As in, massively undercut the Parasites.

Then make this retroactive to all drugs, all the way back, no matter when they were developed.

If a drug company wants to suckle at any teat other than 100% self-funded, they would have to put 100% of their own money towards developing that drug. As it is, there are ZERO DRUGS that haven’t been developed on the taxpayer dime, either in part or in whole.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Feel the burn ❤️‍🔥

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But Sen. Sanders scored a win on Friday, as the CEO of Novo Nordisk, the maker of Ozempic, agreed to testify about the prices he’s charging consumers.

Sen. Sanders is chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), where he’s been investigating Big Pharma and the prices that Americans are forced to pay for drugs that have been used in recent years for weight loss like Ozempic and Wegovy.

“I enjoyed the opportunity of chatting with Mr. Jørgensen this afternoon and thank him for agreeing to voluntarily testify on a solo panel before the HELP Committee on the high cost of Ozempic and Wegovy in the United States,” Sen. Sanders said in a press release.

“Novo Nordisk currently charges Americans with Type 2 diabetes $969 a month for Ozempic, while this same exact drug can be purchased for just $155 in Canada and just $59 in Germany.

Novo Nordisk also charges Americans with obesity $1,349 a month for Wegovy, while this same exact product can be purchased for just $140 in Germany and $92 in the United Kingdom.”

The Inflation Reduction Act passed in 2022 will now allow Medicare to negotiate on just 10 drugs, but Big Pharma has been fighting that modest change in court.


The original article contains 432 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The answer is simple. The corporate G is giving every one the D evidenced by everyone crying 'EE'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

"Well you see senator, we're really, really greedy."

If only.