this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
69 points (96.0% liked)

thebirdspapaya_snark

204 readers
30 users here now

Hello new Lemmy friends!

Word on the street tells us our community is regularly making it the all page. While this is very cool news to hear, we can see how the sudden emergence of our posts in your feed might feel jarring and probably raises some questions. And also how, without knowing the backstory, our community might appear less than virtuous, so here’s a very brief introduction which hopefully will clear a few things up.

The woman we’re discussing is a body positive influencer and media personality who has gained fame and wealth by lying, manipulating, exploiting her children for content, plagiarizing BIPOC creators and blaming her BIPOC content editor for it (thereby ruining her career), among other things. Her fraudulent behavior is no different (I’d argue worse) from the likes of Jay Shetty (google him if you don’t know who he is or what he did). She’s the latest in a long line of grifting influencers who are abusing their power, taking advantage of their position and exploiting their followers. The difference is that she’s Canadian. Our laws around social media and advertising aren’t as clear (and where they are she’s disobeyed them), add to that, our mainstream media has protected her from those who’ve tried to expose her grift and silenced/intimidated anyone who’s tried to speak out.

Our Reddit sub was taken down due to reports of copyright infringement, which is unfounded and categorically untrue as no one ever tried to steal her work and pass it off as their own. The mods have made an appeal. While at first glance it may seem like we’re just “shitting on her” the sub has been more devoted to investigation and posting proof of her lies than just bitching for the sake of bitching. The reality is that she’s hurt, manipulated and let down a lot of people. She stole intellectual property and employment, caused mental distress and has repeatedly told lies to boost engagement and profit off her audience, so people are understandably upset that their voices are being silenced.

We’re grateful to have been welcomed so kindly by so many of you, and to those sticking around to watch the drama unfold, we’re glad to have you!

**all posts are alleged.

Rules:

-Please follow Lemmy content guidelines. See https://lemmy.ca/

-Minor's Right to Privacy: No posts about the children whatsoever. No mention of full names and no photos. Minors must be completely removed from all photos/videos. No exceptions. This goes for ANY child. No just TBP's.

-No snarking on the character or appearance of any of the children. This is a site dedicated to Sarah Landry.

-No posting information that is not readily available online/NoDoxxing: Influencers post an abundance of personal information online. Examples of doxxing include:

-Comments Regarding Mental Health: Jokes or Snide remarks about mental health or unaliving oneself will not be tolerated under any circumstances. No armchair diagnosing.

-Do not post or solicit communication with TBP or related influencers: This includes screenshots and references to 'this is what I commented.' Please message a mod if you would like to share anything anonymously.

-No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, body shaming or other ism/bigotry.

-No TBP crusaders

-No commenting with the sole purpose of being rude/insulting: while criticism/debate is welcome on the page, being purposefully mean, insulting and rude is not.

-No brigading/incitement of mass harassment. Do not post links to affiliate sites, or incite members of the sub to brigade against TBP/related parties (this includes brands).

-Fact check and do your homework: Make sure to research before posting. If you are posting photos or videos that are filtered/photoshopped, make sure it is blatantly obvious. No rumours. no speculations (example Ozempic use).

-No overly vulgar language.

-No advertisement of any kind

-No duplicate posts

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello new Lemmy friends!

Word on the street tells us our community is regularly making it the all page. While this is very cool news to hear, we can see how the sudden emergence of our posts in your feed might feel jarring and probably raises some questions. And also how, without knowing the backstory, our community might appear less than virtuous, so here’s a very brief introduction which hopefully will clear a few things up.

The woman we’re discussing is a body positive influencer and media personality who has gained fame and wealth by lying, manipulating, exploiting her children for content, plagiarizing BIPOC creators and blaming her BIPOC content editor for it (thereby ruining her career), among other things. Her fraudulent behavior is no different (I’d argue worse) from the likes of Jay Shetty (google him if you don’t know who he is or what he did). She’s the latest in a long line of grifting influencers who are abusing their power, taking advantage of their position and exploiting their followers. The difference is that she’s Canadian. Our laws around social media and advertising aren’t as clear (and where they are she’s disobeyed them), add to that, our mainstream media has protected her from those who’ve tried to expose her grift and silenced/intimidated anyone who’s tried to speak out.

Our Reddit sub was taken down due to reports of copyright infringement, which is unfounded and categorically untrue as no one ever tried to steal her work and pass it off as their own. The mods have made an appeal. While at first glance it may seem like we’re just “shitting on her” the sub has been more devoted to investigation and posting proof of her lies than just bitching for the sake of bitching. The reality is that she’s hurt, manipulated and let down a lot of people. She stole intellectual property and employment, caused mental distress and has repeatedly told lies to boost engagement and profit off her audience, so people are understandably upset that their voices are being silenced.

We’re grateful to have been welcomed so kindly by so many of you, and to those sticking around to watch the drama unfold, we’re glad to have you!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is such a good summary, thank you! I hope the appeal can be won but I’m starting to like this community too.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

You bet! And ya I feel the same. There’s a simplicity to Lemmy life that I could really get used to

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I really love this community but, on principle, I think it’s important to get the subreddit reinstated even if we don’t use it as often.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hope you all will get your sub back.

Even if Reddit is going downhill, it still sucks to see it banned.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Thx. It also sucks to have lost a lot of documentation. 😒

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Thank you 😊

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I am starting to like this one, too. Still getting used to the new names, and often wondering who has been with us but just chose a different name and who is new lol. I like this though! I hated it while trying to navigate it on the mobile site but since downloading the thunder app it's much better

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Haha agreed! We’ve chatted recently and I kept a word from my Reddit username 😉. Just playing it safe as there’s some scary bullies in Sarah’s circle (cough Alicia).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

She has a lot of gall to claim copyright infringement to take down the subreddit when her blog was a textbook example of copyright infringement. Reddit was fair use and if you need a lawyer I know quite a few who specialize in copyright

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

(This was the post in April)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I just noticed it says Copywriter and not copyright- that’s kinda funny

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Oh I never saw this. 😖😠

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Wow! It took six weeks or so but they accomplished the mission

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I’m sorry to comment on this one again but my brain keeps going back to it. Was this during the Knix trip? It sounds a lot like Alicia. She and Bri had that sunrise chat and they are both rabid for their Princess and would do anything to protect her. Sarah is very good at having her flying monkeys do the dirty work and she pretends she’s above it. The mask slipped a little last week with her story about the person saying they we’re unfollowing because she was droning on about SI.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is such a good point. Her own tactic will eventually bite her in the butt.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

If you look up the word hypocrite in the dictionary her picture is right there beside the definition so maybe she doesn’t see how ridiculous she’s being

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought she claimed harassment, I didn't know it was copyright infringement

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

It’s flimsy but a lot of these platforms will just take things down rather than fight. She can only claim copyright for the pics and videos she’s taken herself. Maybe buddy Briony claimed her copyright for the pics she had taken - was this soon after the podcast photoshoot?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You’re probably right re: Briony. She’s clearly obsessed with Sarah as she scours comment sections so she can block people. Who even has the time?

Still, the subreddit mods said they never even got a warning. It doesn’t sit well with me that Reddit allows misogyny, underage porn and outright violence but not this. Talk about inconsistent.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Briony who went in full designer clothes with friends during covid restrictions to a low price grocery store (as a joke) and was kicked out for making fun of the store and people while filming content? Sounds about white.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

She whaaat?? Any news pieces about this still around or was it scrubbed?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

everything is still up from reddit search images

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The whole thing smells funny - no warning is unusual and it happened after the rules were tightened up. I thought it was all very well run so they had to try for the copyright infringement. The question is why not just remove the pics deemed to be in violation? It’s really heavy-handed

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Exactly, it could very easily have been remedied. I really hope mods win their appeal as they/we didn’t do anything wrong or unusual.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hello and a warm welcome from this random lemmy user! Good luck with everything, hope you stick around

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Great summary!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

👍🏻😌

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This should be in your sidebar.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Great idea. I just made the change now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (32 children)

Has someone sent the copyright infringement thing to Janette? She was doing something on plagerism?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I think she’s been looped in

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Nicely said. Thx.

load more comments
view more: next ›