their answer; "it was never meant to be secure'
microsoft, thats like your whole problem all the time.
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)
Cybersecurity
5965 readers
115 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Notable mention to [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's not really what they said though. They said that this is not intended as a security mechanism, which is debatable from their original docs. They are maintaining that this was always intended to be used for routing and not as a source for block/allow lists. Frankly, regardless of your opinion on whether Microsoft is misrepresenting their original docs, nobody should be using Service Tags as security. Microsoft is completely correct there.