this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
349 points (91.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20453 readers
202 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 161 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what this is about, but I admire the commitment, the story, the CGI. 7/10.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 96 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It's incredibly difficult to read the captions on this meme, there's not enough contrast with the white text on the light backgrounds.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Even less contrast...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

And when you've finally managed to decipher them, that's when the grammar hits you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

The black outline that is intended to increase legibility is too thin. Honestly, a drop shadow works better than the outline, in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Well it was also inaudible at the same time, thus inreadable was born

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

Ahh, the time of streaming xvid codec and having divX video player everywhere 😂 good old times

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

Xiph have always produced the best stuff. Competition is great and all, but at the end of the day, Xiph's codecs beat everyone at everything.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

libaom is a fucking joke. SVT might be a memory hog, but as the proud owner of a system with enough memory to run it, I can proudly say my 1 minute video rendered in less than ten minutes and somehow had worse compression than x264

Wait, whot?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

I know nothing about the topic, but I like funny images

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When did rav1e become Assembly?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

The image is implying it's 95% written in Assembly and that's why it finished so fast.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

I really like SVT. AOM (or whatever the default was for ffmpeg) was terribly slow. Now I have to try out rav1e.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I really want to know why they implemented a piece of software that's this complicated in assembly. Is it just speed? Then I also want to know what all the great numbers of video codecs I have just uncovered after clicking on "the input format must be .y4m" in their Readme. Since OP seem to know about the 306 options of the official AOM encoder a little, and rav1e also sounds rather CLI-heavy, this also gets my uneducated head wondering where these products are used. Do other app developers drop it in like ffmpeg? Probably. It also sounds like Disney & Co. just have some servers that they have scripted to "encode the corporate fortune". How true is this?