At least the last I was aware, you could just use your own hardware which I always found preferable. I don't think it's a secret that Xfinity sucks bad :-(.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)
IPv6
309 readers
1 users here now
IPv6 Discussions
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
My view on this, at least for higher end devices like laptops, tablets, phones, etc, is that the OS must be secure to threats already because they all support cellular connections, where you will not have a home router to block incoming connections. IOT is, of course, a different story.
The other thing we should all hopefully know is that a lot of threat vectors don't involve incoming connections. Browser zero days, for example.
BTW, all that said, I still don't see why Xfinity can't just provide a better set of knobs on the firewall.
You don't need port forwarding for IPv6 because, unlike IPv4, it doesn't use NAT. It is expected that an IPv6 device will not show up on the "Port Forward" page that was specifically designed to handle IPv4's NAT port rules.
Try to see if there's some dedicated firewall page on the router and there you should be able to "poke a hole" to allow an incoming IPv6 request to reach a device in your network.
I believe OP is already aware of this. At least based on the wording in his post. He specifically says "opening ports in the IPv6 firewall." Could be mistaken though.
Yup, I'm aware.
There's no page for anything to do with ports for ipv6, and the documentation specifically says it's not available to open ports on ipv6.
The only options for configuring the ipv6 firewall are things like blocking ping, and disabling the ipv6 firewall entirely. There were 5 checkboxes, I forget what the other 3 were. It was at a relatives house I was helping so I can't check right now.
IMO if you have to put "you can't do xyz with IPv6" in your documentation...then you need to not ship that product...but Comcast is Comcast...sooo
IMO if you're serious about IPv6 you should probably have your own router running OpenWRT or the like. That's not to say consumer routers don't exist with good v6 support. AT&T provided routers have very good v6 support including full firewall rules for both v4 and v6 on top of the v4 port forwarding for NAT. We'll ignore their PD issues lol. Sounds like Xfinity might just be behind the times. I'd put OpenWRT on a router and use that instead of the ISP router anyway.
view more: next ›