this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
186 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8597 readers
644 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 87 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Finally, a hard drive with the capacity to install more than 2 AAA game titles at once.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

This is obviously just in preparation for future AAA game sizes

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

When I bought my first PC about 1982. The seller told me that I would never live long enough to fill up the 10MB drive. I still bought the 40MB drive and it was still too small.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I remember getting a 2 GB hard drive and thinking I'll never be able to fill it up. Now I have video files more then 10 times that size

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think you might be off by a few years at least, a 40MB drive in 1982 would've been incredibly uncommon.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Idk man.

In the 1980s 8-inch drives used with some mid-range systems increased from a low of about 30 MB in 1980, to a top-of-the-line 3 GB in 1989.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives

Seems like 30MB wasn't horribly uncommon in "mid-range systems" in 1980, so I doubt that 40MB in 1982 would've been "incredibly uncommon."

But I've no personal experience from the time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Mid-range systems" is not referring to personal computers. "8-inch drives" is another clue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

True, he did say PC, fair enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Awesome can't wait til they're cheap so I can replace my many hard drives with just one much larger one.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (31 children)

Make sure you buy two of them so you've got a backup. I'm uncomfortable storing 16TB worth of data on one drive, no way am I putting 32TB of anything I give a shit about onto one drive.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

You can buy large second hand enterprise hard disks for relatively cheap. 20TB disks are like 250 bucks.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No god, so how big is the new CoD going to be?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

One petabyte.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Still not enough to hold all my porn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Holy shit how addicted are you?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Least addicted porn downloader.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps there are content provider. Shooting in RAW stakes of a lot of space.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

I look forward to a Backblaze analysis in a few years.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wonder what the bit error rates are like at that density in practice.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

They're actually 128TB drives, but everything has to be written four times.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Will raid 6 still be viable at this size or will this require something like raid 10 or even moving beyond raid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

ZFS has triple parity support for RAID-Z (basically RAID-5/RAID-6/RAID-7 with better data safety guarantees), so there's that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My solution is RAIDZ5 and storing the backup on LTO6 tape with parity/erasure code. I think the fact that scrub times take 24 hours even on 16TB drives is already over the safety margin. If a drive failure happens, the first thing I'll do to run a manual diff backup which should take a fraction of the time and then run the ZFS resilver.

I'm beginning to see why SSD RAID is being considered now. My guess for HDDs in enterprise is that a RAID 15 (I made this up) would be considered. What I mean is data is stored on two identical servers each running RAID5 or 6. Off the shelf solutions like Gluster exist and that seems to be gaining traction at least according to Linus Tech Tips.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's enough for the entire filmography of William Hanna and Joseph Barbera in beautiful 1080p (upscaled using world class software), and it would probably still be enough for some of the early shows of Cartoon Network, at least in 480p.

But then it would take ages to load anyway since it's a hard drive and therefore has moving parts, leading to a significantly higher failure rate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ages is an understatement. This drive uses two new technologies that essentially expand the track momentarily plus smr

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Eons perhaps?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Found the anti-HDD drama queen

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›